我国“醉驾入刑”之司法反思
发布时间：2018-09-05 08:46
【摘要】：“醉驾”即醉酒驾驶机动车,是指在当人体血液内酒精含量达到每100毫升80毫克以上程度时在道路上驾驶机动车的行为。2011年5月1日之前,我国调整醉酒驾驶行为的法律模式是一种二元规制体系,即根据醉酒驾驶行为的具体情节,分别按照行政法规或刑法的相关规定进行规制和处罚。2011年5月1日,《刑法修正案(八)》的生效标志着“醉驾入刑”的正式确立和全面实施,其第二十二条规定,在刑法第一百三十三条后增加一条,作为第一百三十三条之一：“……在道路上醉酒驾驶机动车的,处拘役,并处罚金”。“醉驾一律入刑”引发了实务争议,公安、检察、法院各持己见。司法机关在处理具体醉酒驾驶的刑事案件时遇到了程序与实体之困：公安机关有限的警力应付醉驾不堪重负；检察机关审查起诉遭遇尴尬；人民法院定罪量刑失衡。因此,醉驾不应一律入刑,原因在于：“醉驾一律入刑”与刑法谦抑原则背道而驰；“醉驾一律入刑”与刑法逻辑关系南辕北辙；现实国情难以承受“醉驾一律入刑”之重。应当修改立法,将刑法第一百三十三条之一第一款修改为“……在道路上醉酒驾驶机动车情节严重的,处拘役,并处罚金”。在修改立法的基础上可以通过司法解释制定“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪定罪标准,明确量刑情节。
[Abstract]:"drunk driving" means driving a motor vehicle on the road when the alcohol content in the body reaches 80 milligrams per 100 milliliters or more. Before May 1, 2011, The legal mode of adjusting drunken driving behavior in China is a dual regulation system, that is, according to the specific circumstances of drunken driving behavior, On May 1, 2011, the entry into force of the Amendment (VIII) of the Criminal Law marked the formal establishment and full implementation of "drunken driving into the Criminal Code", which was stipulated in Article 22 of the Criminal Law. Add an article after article 133 of the Criminal Code as article 133 bis: ". Whoever drives a motor vehicle drunk on a road shall be sentenced to criminal detention and shall also be fined. " "drunken driving into the penalty" triggered a practical dispute, public security, procuratorial, courts of their own views. When dealing with the specific criminal cases of drunk driving, the judicial organs encounter the difficulties of procedure and entity: the limited police force of the public security organs can cope with the heavy burden of drunk driving; the procuratorial organs encounter embarrassment in the examination and prosecution; and the people's courts are out of balance in conviction and sentencing. Therefore, drunken driving should not be uniformly punished because it runs counter to the principle of modesty and restraint in criminal law; it is incompatible with the logical relationship between drunk driving and criminal law; and it is difficult to bear the heavy burden of "drunken driving all entering criminal law". The first paragraph of article 133 bis of the Criminal Code shall be amended to read "." Those who drive a motor vehicle drunk on a road if the circumstances are serious shall be sentenced to criminal detention and concurrently be fined. " On the basis of amending the legislation, we can make the conviction standard of "drunk driving" dangerous driving crime through judicial explanation, and define the circumstances of sentencing.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.36;D926
本文编号：2223774
[Abstract]:"drunk driving" means driving a motor vehicle on the road when the alcohol content in the body reaches 80 milligrams per 100 milliliters or more. Before May 1, 2011, The legal mode of adjusting drunken driving behavior in China is a dual regulation system, that is, according to the specific circumstances of drunken driving behavior, On May 1, 2011, the entry into force of the Amendment (VIII) of the Criminal Law marked the formal establishment and full implementation of "drunken driving into the Criminal Code", which was stipulated in Article 22 of the Criminal Law. Add an article after article 133 of the Criminal Code as article 133 bis: ". Whoever drives a motor vehicle drunk on a road shall be sentenced to criminal detention and shall also be fined. " "drunken driving into the penalty" triggered a practical dispute, public security, procuratorial, courts of their own views. When dealing with the specific criminal cases of drunk driving, the judicial organs encounter the difficulties of procedure and entity: the limited police force of the public security organs can cope with the heavy burden of drunk driving; the procuratorial organs encounter embarrassment in the examination and prosecution; and the people's courts are out of balance in conviction and sentencing. Therefore, drunken driving should not be uniformly punished because it runs counter to the principle of modesty and restraint in criminal law; it is incompatible with the logical relationship between drunk driving and criminal law; and it is difficult to bear the heavy burden of "drunken driving all entering criminal law". The first paragraph of article 133 bis of the Criminal Code shall be amended to read "." Those who drive a motor vehicle drunk on a road if the circumstances are serious shall be sentenced to criminal detention and concurrently be fined. " On the basis of amending the legislation, we can make the conviction standard of "drunk driving" dangerous driving crime through judicial explanation, and define the circumstances of sentencing.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.36;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 于志刚;;危险驾驶行为的罪刑评价——以“醉酒驾驶”交通肇事行为为视角[J];法学;2009年09期
2 郭胜峰;;浅析“5·7杭州胡斌飙车案”的定性及我国交通肇事犯罪的立法完善[J];法制与社会;2010年02期
3 尹新媛;;浅论危险驾驶罪[J];法制与社会;2010年12期
4 张广鲁;;危险驾驶行为的刑法定性分析[J];法制与社会;2010年31期
5 田全;;论醉酒驾驶机动车的法律责任——从一则案例谈起[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
6 赵野松;;对侦办醉酒驾驶机动车案件的若干思考[J];公安学刊(浙江警察学院学报);2011年03期
7 孟君;;危险驾驶行为的刑法规制[J];湖北警官学院学报;2010年02期
8 周少华;;刑法的目的及其观念分析[J];华东政法大学学报;2008年02期
9 张建;;“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪的反拨与正源[J];华东政法大学学报;2011年05期
10 周永坤;;对酒后驾车应单独立法并予以严惩[J];河北学刊;2009年06期
，本文编号：2223774
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2223774.html
