法官恣意导致的量刑偏差原因分析

发布时间：2018-09-07 18:04

【摘要】：量刑问题是一个世界性难题，世界各国都在积极地探讨刑事立法和司法对策来规范法官的量刑活动，减少量刑失衡和量刑偏差的问题，从而实现量刑的均衡。本文采用案例分析和理论分析相结合的方法，通过对重庆市大足县法院以及石柱县法院相关案例数据的分析，并结合社会典型案例，对我国法官量刑偏差问题进行了较为全面、系统的论证，同时还对我国量刑制度的完善提出自己的设想。全文共分为五部分，共四万余字。第一部分，，概述量刑偏差的基本概念，对量刑偏差和量刑差异概念进行了比较分析，在此基础上简要分析了导致量刑偏差的原因和特点，并明晰了法官恣意量刑的概念。第二部分，对我国量刑偏差的现状进行归纳：第一，同一法院对相同案件处理不同；第二，不同法院对同一案件处理结果不同；第三，不同法官对同一案件处理结果不同；第四，不同法院或不同法官对相似案件处理不同；第五，不同案件得不到不同的处理；第六，共同犯罪案件因另案处理而出现的量刑偏差。第三部分，在分析了我国量刑偏差的现状后，论述了法官恣意量刑引起量刑偏差的内在因素。内在因素主要是：第一，法官不同的业务素质、政治素质和心理素质对量刑的影响；第二，法官不同的世界观、人生观和价值观对量刑的影响；第三，法官不同的社会背景、经济背景和教育背景对量刑的影响；第四，因法官的偏私导致的量刑偏差的情况。第四部分，论述了法官恣意量刑引起量刑偏差的外在因素。外在因素主要是：第一，权力部门对法官量刑造成的影响；第二，公众媒体对法官量刑的影响；第三，“民意”对法官量刑的影响。第五部分，针对法官恣意量刑引起的量刑偏差，论证相应的对策和措施。第一，建立系统合理的量刑规则；第二，运行和不断完善量刑程序，改变量刑偏差的现状；第三，建立和完善法官判罚说理机制。
[Abstract]:Sentencing is a worldwide problem. Countries all over the world are actively exploring criminal legislation and judicial countermeasures to regulate the sentencing activities of judges, reduce the sentencing imbalance and sentencing deviation, so as to achieve the balance of sentencing. This paper adopts the method of case analysis and theoretical analysis, through the analysis of the relevant case data of Dazu County Court and Shizhu County Court of Chongqing, and combining with the typical cases of the society, it makes a more comprehensive analysis on the problem of sentencing deviation of judges in our country. At the same time, the author puts forward his own idea on the perfection of sentencing system in our country. The full text is divided into five parts, a total of more than 40, 000 words. In the first part, the basic concept of sentencing deviation is summarized, and the concepts of sentencing deviation and sentencing difference are compared and analyzed. On this basis, the causes and characteristics of sentencing deviation are briefly analyzed, and the concept of arbitrary sentencing by judges is clarified. The second part summarizes the current situation of sentencing bias in China: first, the same court deals with the same case differently; second, different courts deal with the same case differently; third, different judges deal with the same case differently; Fourth, different courts or different judges deal with similar cases differently; fifthly, different cases can not be dealt with differently; sixthly, the sentencing deviation of joint crime cases due to other cases. The third part, after analyzing the present situation of sentencing deviation in our country, it discusses the internal factors of sentencing deviation caused by arbitrary sentencing by judges. The internal factors are as follows: first, the influence of judges' different professional qualities, political qualities and psychological qualities on sentencing; second, the influence of judges' different world outlook, outlook on life and values on sentencing; third, the different social backgrounds of judges. The impact of economic background and educational background on sentencing; fourth, the bias of sentencing caused by the bias of judges. The fourth part discusses the external factors of sentencing bias caused by the arbitrary sentencing of judges. The external factors are as follows: first, the influence of the power department on the judge's sentencing; secondly, the influence of the public media on the judge's sentencing; thirdly, the influence of "public opinion" on the judge's sentencing. The fifth part, to judge arbitrary sentencing caused by sentencing deviation, to demonstrate the corresponding countermeasures and measures. First, to establish a system of reasonable sentencing rules; second, to run and constantly improve sentencing procedures, to change the current situation of sentencing deviation; third, to establish and improve the judge judgment reasoning mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】