再论刑事审判活动中的民愤因素
发布时间：2018-11-02 10:50
【摘要】：民愤早已存在于刑事审判活动中是不置可否的事实,从古代中国到当下社会,民愤参与刑事审判的案件不胜枚举。民愤的大小体现着犯罪对人们既存的价值观念的破坏程度,是人们心理上原有的价值平衡因受犯罪的冲击而失衡的严重程度外化；同时,民愤的大小反应了人们对犯罪的否定性评价的严厉程度,内含着人们要求惩罚犯罪以求恢复价值的愿望的强度。因此应提倡民愤在刑事审判活动中发挥应有作用。另一种声音否定将民愤作为量刑的依据,认为把民愤的有无和大小作为量刑的重要依据没有理论上和法理上的依据,更有悖于刑罚目的。此种观点认为,从现实社会条件看民愤作为影响量刑的因素存在诸多不合理之处,也不利于审判机关依法独立行使审判权,与我国法律规定的审判机关依法独立刑事审判权的原则相违背。 本文将从民愤产生原因,得以存在的基础方面着手,分析民愤在刑事审判活动中所起的作用。着重分析刑事审判活动中值得探讨的民愤问题以及如何处理刑事审判活动中的民愤因素,以期找到二者的结合点,而助于刑事审判。
[Abstract]:From ancient China to the present society, there are numerous cases of people's indignation participating in criminal trial. The size of public indignation reflects the degree of destruction of the existing values of people by crime, and is the externalization of the serious degree of imbalance caused by the impact of crime on the original value balance of people in psychology; At the same time, the size of public anger reflects the severity of people's negative evaluation of crime, and contains the intensity of people's desire to punish the crime in order to restore its value. Therefore, public indignation should be advocated to play its due role in the criminal trial. Another kind of voice denies to regard the public anger as the basis of sentencing, and thinks that the existence and size of the public anger as the important basis of sentencing has no theoretical and legal basis, and is more contrary to the purpose of punishment. According to this view, judging from the actual social conditions, there are many unreasonableness in the public indignation as a factor affecting sentencing, and it is also unfavorable for the judicial organs to exercise their judicial power independently according to law. In violation of the principle of independent criminal jurisdiction in accordance with the law. This paper will analyze the role of public anger in criminal trial from the causes of public anger and the basis of its existence. This paper focuses on the analysis of the issue of public indignation in criminal trial activities and how to deal with the factors of public indignation in criminal trial activities in order to find the joint point of the two and to help the criminal trial.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.2;D926
本文编号：2305800
[Abstract]:From ancient China to the present society, there are numerous cases of people's indignation participating in criminal trial. The size of public indignation reflects the degree of destruction of the existing values of people by crime, and is the externalization of the serious degree of imbalance caused by the impact of crime on the original value balance of people in psychology; At the same time, the size of public anger reflects the severity of people's negative evaluation of crime, and contains the intensity of people's desire to punish the crime in order to restore its value. Therefore, public indignation should be advocated to play its due role in the criminal trial. Another kind of voice denies to regard the public anger as the basis of sentencing, and thinks that the existence and size of the public anger as the important basis of sentencing has no theoretical and legal basis, and is more contrary to the purpose of punishment. According to this view, judging from the actual social conditions, there are many unreasonableness in the public indignation as a factor affecting sentencing, and it is also unfavorable for the judicial organs to exercise their judicial power independently according to law. In violation of the principle of independent criminal jurisdiction in accordance with the law. This paper will analyze the role of public anger in criminal trial from the causes of public anger and the basis of its existence. This paper focuses on the analysis of the issue of public indignation in criminal trial activities and how to deal with the factors of public indignation in criminal trial activities in order to find the joint point of the two and to help the criminal trial.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.2;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 田佳灵;;民意对司法裁判过程的影响[J];安徽职业技术学院学报;2009年03期
2 孟庆华;刘涌案件的刑法适用问题与思考[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
3 孙发;司法权威初步解读——概念、分类和特征[J];当代法学;2003年09期
4 聂昭伟;论我国刑事诉讼中专家法律意见的规范化[J];法学;2005年02期
5 梁白美;王效萱;;浅析我国司法独立的完善[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
6 李修源;关于舆论监督与司法独立的两个话题[J];人民司法;2000年08期
7 刘燕;;案件事实的人物建构——崔英杰案叙事分析[J];法制与社会发展;2009年02期
8 刘昂;;解读司法领域的民意——由邱兴华案引发的思考[J];山东警察学院学报;2007年04期
9 崔双平;;论司法权威流失的成因及消解[J];通化师范学院学报;2007年07期
10 赵斯海 ,华大明;对社会心理学的再认识[J];上海大学学报(社会科学版);1990年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张艳丽;关于邓玉娇案审判的思考[D];山西大学;2011年
，本文编号：2305800
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2305800.html
