媒体监督与司法公正的法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-18 20:48
【摘要】：对于媒体监督与司法公正的问题，已经有了不少的研究。不过，伴随着微博等新型媒体形式的发展，媒体监督呈现出新的特点。此外，随着中国司法改革的深入进行，以及司法实践经验的不断累积，这将对司法公正有新的认识与领悟。因此，，对媒体监督与司法公正的重新审视，就显得必要了。 本文侧重于对媒体监督与司法公正的法律问题的探讨。在引言部分，简要谈及媒体新形式的发展，并概括介绍媒体监督与司法公正的一些重要研究，从而引出正文部分。 本文正文分为五部分。正文第一部分主要论述媒体监督的基本问题。在这一部分里，首先探讨的是媒体监督司法的意蕴，并对媒体监督司法予以定义。然后讨论媒体监督司法的特征。其中，包括媒体监督的要义，媒体监督的主体、手段和效力，以及媒体监督的新特点。第二部分是对媒体监督与司法公正关系的探析。关于司法公正的辨析，理所当然地成为首先研究的重点。通过对司法公正的梳理，得出“司法公正应更多的从对司法权的约束、保障司法过程的中立与公开，强调程序公正的角度来理解”的看法。基于这个观点，接着就正式进入媒体监督与司法公正关系的分析。第三部分主要从现实层面来分析媒体监督与司法公正的关系。通过分析发现，两者是存在冲突的表现的。这集中变现为媒体监督与司法中立的冲突。对于冲突的存在，接下来就是分析其中的原因。第四部分，侧重于对英美经验的考察。英美经验的核心就是新闻自由与公正审判的平衡。正文的第五部分，就是详细探讨媒体监督与司法公正的良性互动之制度构建。要实现良性互动，就要求媒体监督司法遵循必要的基本原则。它们是保障媒体监督权利原则、权利与权利平衡原则和“有限度”原则。明确基本原则之后，就需要提出一些制度构想了。制度设计涉及两方面，一是完善媒体的监督，二是完善司法的运作。这是实现媒体监督与司法公正的良性互动的关键。 结论部分总结回顾了正文论述的五部分内容。总之，本文的立足点是寻求媒体监督与司法运作“各司其职”，最终实现良性互动。
[Abstract]:For the media supervision and judicial justice, there has been a lot of research. However, with the development of Weibo and other new media forms, media supervision presents new characteristics. In addition, with the deepening of China's judicial reform and the accumulation of judicial practice experience, this will have a new understanding of judicial justice. Therefore, it is necessary to re-examine the media supervision and judicial justice. This paper focuses on the legal issues of media supervision and judicial justice. In the introduction part, it briefly discusses the development of new forms of media, and introduces some important research on media supervision and judicial justice, which leads to the main part. The text of this paper is divided into five parts. The first part of the text mainly discusses the basic problems of media supervision. In this part, the first part is the media supervision of the meaning of justice, and the definition of media supervision of justice. Then discuss the characteristics of the media supervision of the judiciary. Including the essentials of media supervision, the main body, means and effectiveness of media supervision, as well as the new features of media supervision. The second part is the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. The discrimination of judicial justice has naturally become the focus of the first research. By combing the judicial justice, the author draws the conclusion that judicial justice should be understood more from the angle of judicial power restriction, the protection of the neutrality and openness of the judicial process, and the emphasis on procedural justice. Based on this viewpoint, the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice is made. The third part mainly analyzes the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. Through the analysis, it is found that there is a conflict between the two. This concentration becomes the conflict between media supervision and judicial neutrality. For the existence of conflict, the next is to analyze the causes. The fourth part focuses on the British and American experience. The core of British and American experience is the balance between press freedom and fair trial. The fifth part of the text is to discuss the system construction of media supervision and judicial justice. In order to realize benign interaction, media supervision and judicature should follow the necessary basic principles. They are the principle of safeguarding the right of media supervision, the principle of balance between right and right, and the principle of "limited". Once the basic principles are clear, some institutional ideas need to be put forward. System design involves two aspects, one is to perfect the supervision of the media, the other is to perfect the operation of the judiciary. This is the key to the benign interaction between media supervision and judicial justice. The conclusion summarizes and reviews the five parts of the text. In a word, the foothold of this paper is to seek media supervision and judicial operation to achieve positive interaction.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926;G206
本文编号：2341179
[Abstract]:For the media supervision and judicial justice, there has been a lot of research. However, with the development of Weibo and other new media forms, media supervision presents new characteristics. In addition, with the deepening of China's judicial reform and the accumulation of judicial practice experience, this will have a new understanding of judicial justice. Therefore, it is necessary to re-examine the media supervision and judicial justice. This paper focuses on the legal issues of media supervision and judicial justice. In the introduction part, it briefly discusses the development of new forms of media, and introduces some important research on media supervision and judicial justice, which leads to the main part. The text of this paper is divided into five parts. The first part of the text mainly discusses the basic problems of media supervision. In this part, the first part is the media supervision of the meaning of justice, and the definition of media supervision of justice. Then discuss the characteristics of the media supervision of the judiciary. Including the essentials of media supervision, the main body, means and effectiveness of media supervision, as well as the new features of media supervision. The second part is the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. The discrimination of judicial justice has naturally become the focus of the first research. By combing the judicial justice, the author draws the conclusion that judicial justice should be understood more from the angle of judicial power restriction, the protection of the neutrality and openness of the judicial process, and the emphasis on procedural justice. Based on this viewpoint, the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice is made. The third part mainly analyzes the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. Through the analysis, it is found that there is a conflict between the two. This concentration becomes the conflict between media supervision and judicial neutrality. For the existence of conflict, the next is to analyze the causes. The fourth part focuses on the British and American experience. The core of British and American experience is the balance between press freedom and fair trial. The fifth part of the text is to discuss the system construction of media supervision and judicial justice. In order to realize benign interaction, media supervision and judicature should follow the necessary basic principles. They are the principle of safeguarding the right of media supervision, the principle of balance between right and right, and the principle of "limited". Once the basic principles are clear, some institutional ideas need to be put forward. System design involves two aspects, one is to perfect the supervision of the media, the other is to perfect the operation of the judiciary. This is the key to the benign interaction between media supervision and judicial justice. The conclusion summarizes and reviews the five parts of the text. In a word, the foothold of this paper is to seek media supervision and judicial operation to achieve positive interaction.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926;G206
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 王亚新;;司法成本与司法效率——中国法院的财政保障与法官激励[J];法学家;2010年04期
2 顾培东;论对司法的传媒监督[J];法学研究;1999年06期
3 郑成良;;法治公信力与司法公信力[J];法学研究;2007年04期
4 贺卫方;传媒与司法三题[J];法学研究;1998年06期
5 李良荣;论中国新闻媒体的双轨制——再论中国新闻媒体的双重性[J];现代传播;2003年04期
6 卞建林;媒体监督与司法公正[J];政法论坛;2000年06期
7 赵利;;媒体监督与司法公正的博弈[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
8 徐昕;卢荣荣;黄艳好;;中国司法改革年度报告(2011)[J];政法论坛;2012年02期
本文编号：2341179
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2341179.html
