参审制研究

发布时间：2018-11-27 08:05

【摘要】：参审制，相比陪审团制度，无论是其知名度还是影响力都远不及陪审团制度，但是它作为一种新型的民众参与审判模式日渐被学人所熟知，并且从属性上予以归类的话，，我国的人民陪审员制度也可以归类为参审制，只是人民陪审员制度自出生时就带有的强烈的意识形态“胎记”往往模糊了其本身作为一种司法制度所应当具备的职能。文章主要从以下几个方面展开：从方法的角度来看，主要采用了历史的方法和比较的方法。历史的方法主要用于参审制的历史沿革、陪审团制度的演变、人民陪审员制度的演变过程的回溯等。如通过对参审制在法国和德国的从无到有的过程的回顾，不仅对参审制有一个认知，告诉大家参审制到底是一个什么“东西”，而且还看到了在每个阶段是如何演变的。比较的方法主要用于参审制与陪审团制度的比较、参审制与人民陪审员制度的比较等。通过比较的方法则可以找出这两种“事物”之间的相同点和不同点，找出其根本的不同/相同，有利于将其合理的归类，当然同时这也是一个认知的过程。从行文的逻辑思路来看，首先文章的第一章对参审制是什么进行一个详细的介绍，这其中给出了自己对参审制的定义，并以此为基础对参审制、陪审团与陪审制的层次进行一个划分，最后对参审制进行一个类型化的研究。第二章对参审制的演变历史进行了一个全面的回溯，在这其中着重对司法民主传统进行了回溯与评析。第三章法国和德国为标本详细论述了参审制的运作流程。在第四章中，笔者将目光移向了这个法治久久不上轨道的国家，对人民陪审员制度究竟是不是参审制进行了一个建立在比较基础上的探讨。从内容上看，文章对参审制从萌芽到形成，再到确立的过程进行了回溯，在此基础上将参审制的运作流程展示出来。然后对参审制的概念进行一个界定并对其与陪审团制度、陪审制的层次关系进行了探讨。文章最后对人民陪审员制度的性质进行了深入的分析，并藉此对人民陪审员制度与参审制的关系如何提出了笔者自己的看法。
[Abstract]:Compared with jury system, trial system is far less famous and influential than jury system, but as a new type of popular participation trial mode, it is increasingly well known to scholars and classified from attribute. The people's jury system of our country can also be classified as the system of trial participation, but the strong ideology "birthmark" of the system of people's jurors from the time of birth often blurs its function as a kind of judicial system. The article mainly starts from the following aspects: from the point of view of method, it mainly adopts the historical method and the method of comparison. Historical methods are mainly used in the historical evolution of the trial system, the evolution of the jury system and the retrospect of the evolution process of the people's jury system. For example, through the review of the process from scratch in France and Germany, there is not only a cognition of the system, telling us what it is, but also how it evolves in every stage. The methods of comparison are mainly used to compare the trial system and the jury system, and the system of the people's jury and so on. Through the method of comparison, we can find out the similarities and differences between the two kinds of "things", and find out the fundamental differences / similarities, which is helpful to classify them reasonably, but it is also a cognitive process. From the logic of the article, first of all, the first chapter of the article is a detailed introduction of what the system is, which gives its own definition of the system, and on the basis of the system, The level of jury and jury system is divided. The second chapter makes a comprehensive retrospect of the evolution of the system, in which it focuses on the judicial democratic tradition. The third chapter discusses the operation process of the system in detail in France and Germany. In the fourth chapter, the author shifts his eyes to the country where the rule of law has not been on track for a long time, and probes into whether the system of people's assessors is based on a comparative basis. From the content point of view, the paper retroactively traces the process from germination to formation, and then to the establishment of the system. On this basis, the operation process of the system is displayed. Then it defines the concept of trial system and discusses the hierarchical relationship between it and jury system. In the end, the author makes a deep analysis of the nature of the people's jury system and puts forward his own views on the relationship between the people's jury system and the system of trial.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】