论司法裁判的可接受性

发布时间：2018-11-29 09:09

【摘要】：目前,我国社会主义法律体系已基本形成,这一方面表明法治中国的建设己基本实现“有法可依”,另一方面也显示出法学的研究视角逐渐由立法转向司法活动。而司法裁判的可接受性成为研究司法活动的一个热门问题。修辞学因其在价值判断上“心证公开”的独特优势及修辞学中修辞论辩的适用被视为实现司法裁判可接受性的一种可能视角。然而,修辞学对于实现裁判的可接受性的意义是什么?通过何种方法可能实现司法裁判的可接受性?它在实现司法裁判可接受性的过程中存在哪些问题?这都是需要我们深入到修辞学的具体理论中来结合实践中的案例进行进行分析和探讨。文章主要内容包括五个部分,第一部分关于是司法裁判可接受性的理论概述,分别论述了关于司法裁判可接受性的概念和实现司法裁判可接受性的标准;第二部分是在司法裁判中的修辞学,涉及修辞学的基本释义以及司法裁判领域内的修辞学的主要理论;第三部分主要涉及修辞视角下实现裁判可接受性的意义;第四部分具体论述了修辞视角下实现裁判可接受性的方法,分别包括庭审过程中修辞方法的运用和裁判文书中修辞方法的运用;第五部分描写了修辞学对裁判可接受性的消极影响及应对措施。
[Abstract]:At present, the socialist legal system of our country has been basically formed, which on the one hand indicates that the construction of China under the rule of law has basically realized "there are laws to be followed", on the other hand, it also shows that the research angle of law has gradually changed from legislation to judicial activities. The acceptability of judicial decision has become a hot issue in the study of judicial activities. Rhetoric is regarded as a possible angle of view to realize the acceptability of judicial judgment because of its unique advantage in value judgment and the application of rhetoric argument in rhetoric. However, what is the meaning of rhetoric for achieving the acceptability of referees? By what means is it possible to achieve the acceptability of the administration of justice? What are the problems in achieving the acceptability of the administration of justice? This requires us to go deep into the specific theory of rhetoric to combine with practical cases to analyze and discuss. The main content of this paper includes five parts. The first part is about the theory of the acceptability of the judicial decision, and discusses the concept of the acceptability of the judicial decision and the standard of realizing the acceptability of the judicial decision. The second part is the rhetoric in the judicial judgment, which involves the basic interpretation of rhetoric and the main theory of rhetoric in the field of judicial adjudication, the third part mainly concerns the significance of realizing the acceptability of judgment from the perspective of rhetoric. The fourth part discusses the methods to realize the acceptability of judgment from the perspective of rhetoric, including the use of rhetorical methods in the process of trial and the use of rhetorical methods in adjudicative documents. The fifth part describes the negative influence of rhetoric on the acceptability of referees and the countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】