刘某与东江公司、建安公司建设工程施工合同纠纷案评析
发布时间：2018-11-29 13:15
【摘要】：随着我国经济的繁荣,房地产业蓬勃发展,受建筑市场巨大利益的诱惑,各类民事主体纷纷介入这一领域,由此引发的建筑施工类纠纷案件呈逐年上升趋势。但由于建筑领域专业性强、市场操作不规范现象严重,同时由于国家对建筑领域管理性规范较多,立法层次复杂,导致在合同性质、合同效力的认定和法律适用上易起纷争。2005年1月最高人民法院颁布施行的《关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》(以下简称《司法解释》)对民事审判实践中遇到的与建设工程施工合同各方当事人利益有关的许多重要问题作了规定,有效规范了建筑市场秩序并对人民法院审理案件提供了有力的指导。但在实务中《司法解释》具体条款如何适用和理解也成为司法界争相讨论的话题,如无效施工合同、实际施工人、工程价款优先受偿权等条款引起业界的广泛关注和讨论,如何准确地理解和适用《司法解释》上述条款,无疑是审判实践首先要解决的问题。同时审判实践亦表明《司法解释》在建设工程施工合同效力的认定、实际施工人权益的保护、建设工程优先受偿权等存在需要完善之处,结合案例通过对前述问题的分析,以期能对此类案件的立法及法律实务提供有益的建议。
[Abstract]:With the prosperity of our economy and the booming development of the real estate industry, all kinds of civil subjects get involved in this field one after another because of the temptation of the huge interests of the construction market. As a result, the cases of construction disputes are on the rise year by year. However, due to the strong specialization in the field of construction, the serious phenomenon of non-standard market operation, and the fact that the state has more administrative norms in the field of construction, and the legislative level is complex, it leads to the nature of the contract. In January 2005, the Supreme people's Court promulgated and implemented the interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of construction contract disputes (hereinafter referred to as "judicial interpretation"). (>) many important problems encountered in the practice of civil trials relating to the interests of the parties to the construction contract of the construction project, Effectively standardized the order of the construction market and provided effective guidance for the people's court to try cases. However, in practice, how to apply and understand the specific terms of "Judicial interpretation" has also become a controversial topic in the judicial circles, such as invalid construction contracts, actual constructors, and the preferential right to receive compensation for the project price, and so on, which has aroused widespread concern and discussion in the industry. How to accurately understand and apply the above clause is undoubtedly the first problem to be solved in trial practice. At the same time, the trial practice also shows that the judicial interpretation needs to be perfected in the determination of the validity of the construction contract, the protection of the rights and interests of the actual constructors, the priority of the construction project to be compensated, and so on. In order to provide useful suggestions for the legislation and practice of this kind of cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6;D926
本文编号：2365092
[Abstract]:With the prosperity of our economy and the booming development of the real estate industry, all kinds of civil subjects get involved in this field one after another because of the temptation of the huge interests of the construction market. As a result, the cases of construction disputes are on the rise year by year. However, due to the strong specialization in the field of construction, the serious phenomenon of non-standard market operation, and the fact that the state has more administrative norms in the field of construction, and the legislative level is complex, it leads to the nature of the contract. In January 2005, the Supreme people's Court promulgated and implemented the interpretation of the legal issues applicable to the trial of construction contract disputes (hereinafter referred to as "judicial interpretation"). (>) many important problems encountered in the practice of civil trials relating to the interests of the parties to the construction contract of the construction project, Effectively standardized the order of the construction market and provided effective guidance for the people's court to try cases. However, in practice, how to apply and understand the specific terms of "Judicial interpretation" has also become a controversial topic in the judicial circles, such as invalid construction contracts, actual constructors, and the preferential right to receive compensation for the project price, and so on, which has aroused widespread concern and discussion in the industry. How to accurately understand and apply the above clause is undoubtedly the first problem to be solved in trial practice. At the same time, the trial practice also shows that the judicial interpretation needs to be perfected in the determination of the validity of the construction contract, the protection of the rights and interests of the actual constructors, the priority of the construction project to be compensated, and so on. In order to provide useful suggestions for the legislation and practice of this kind of cases.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 穆昌亮;合同相对性原则刍议[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2003年05期
2 叶燕芳;;建设工程价款优先受偿权与相关权利的冲突处理[J];经济研究导刊;2011年20期
3 冯小光;《关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》的理解与适用[J];建筑经济;2005年01期
4 崔建远;我国物权法应选取的结构原则[J];法制与社会发展;1995年03期
5 严宏伟;;关于建设工程价款优先受偿权的几点思考[J];中国新技术新产品;2011年03期
，本文编号：2365092
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2365092.html
