法官思维方式探析
[Abstract]:The law needs to be formulated and enforced by the legal person. Among many legal people, judges are most closely related to the realization of the rule of law. Judges deal with tension between disputes and laws by means of judicial trial (application of the law). In the judicial practice of our country, the way of thinking of judges determines to a great extent the rationality and legitimacy of judicial decisions, which can reflect the justice of the judicial system and then affect the process of the construction of our country's legal system. Starting with the concept, characteristics and structure of the judge's thinking mode, this paper analyzes the restrictive factors of judge's thinking from the perspective of demonstration, and puts forward the external restrictive factors and internal (institutional) restrictive factors. Then the author expounds the basic method of judge's thinking from the angle of rules and principles, and finally puts forward two requirements of professionalization and independence to the perfection of judge's thinking mode. The first chapter, the basic analysis of the judge's mode of thinking. From thinking to legal thinking and then to judge's thinking mode, this paper clarifies the concept of judge's thinking mode, enumerates four characteristics of judge's thinking mode in view of judge's position and judicial function. This paper puts forward three elements of the judge's thinking mode, and distinguishes the judge's thinking mode from that of the other five kinds of legal persons (legislators, lawyers, prosecutors, jurists and administrative law enforcers). The second chapter, the external restriction of the judge's mode of thinking. This chapter puts forward the external restrictive factors of judges' thinking mode from four aspects: personal factors, economic considerations, political considerations and legal education. In view of each aspect, the meaning or the present situation of the restriction factors are first clarified, and then the influence and function of these factors on the judges' thinking are analyzed. The third chapter, the internal restriction of the judge's thinking mode. The research on the thinking mode of judges is changed from "human" to "system": on the one hand, many characteristics of Chinese traditional thinking mode of judges are inevitably precipitated in the present judicial practice due to the reasons of inheritance; On the other hand, there are some special defects in the current judicial system (localization of judicial system, weak or too strong supervision of various kinds, administration of court management and non-professionalization of judges), which affect the independent thinking of judges and impair the justice of judicature. The fourth chapter, the concrete method of judge's thinking. In dealing with the rules of law, the judges mainly use a three-paragraph reasoning mode of thinking, and at the same time pay attention to the mastery of the three basic methods of legal discovery, legal interpretation and legal argumentation. They and the three-paragraph reasoning form the whole of the method used by the judge to think about the case; To deal with the principle of law, the judge focuses on the judicial effect of the principle of law. The fifth chapter, the consummation of the judge's thinking mode in our country. This chapter puts forward some opinions on how to perfect the thinking mode of judges in our country from two aspects: optimizing the professional thinking of judges and perfecting the independence of the judge system. To optimize the professional thinking of judges includes four measures: carrying out elite education, perfecting the system of selecting and appointing judges, improving judicial skills and establishing a professional security system. Perfecting the independent judge system mainly includes three strategies: removing the administration of justice, changing the supervision mode of the people's Congress to the judicature and straightening out the relationship between the Party and the judiciary.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D916.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张烁,虞振威;司法行政化的理性反思[J];理论界;2005年04期
2 孙海华;;改变司法行政化 法官才能正常化[J];吉林人大工作;2008年05期
3 张明乃,陆福兴;司法行政化对司法公正的危害[J];湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期
4 田百龙;;司法独立与司法行政化的界限[J];法制与社会;2008年03期
5 常洁琨;;现代司法理念与法官思维[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2006年02期
6 彭志新;;用思维保障公正[J];江淮法治;2008年20期
7 李振聪;法官该怎么思维着[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2005年05期
8 孙笑侠;法官思维为什么“千古流传”[J];中国社会导刊;2005年19期
9 邬凡敏;以现代司法理念为视角:对当前法官思维方式的分析与思考[J];法律适用;2004年12期
10 徐艳丽;;从倾听艺术谈庭审驾驭能力[J];山东审判;2006年02期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 孔志国;;法院的非行政化,一个宪法问题[A];2005中国制度经济学年会精选论文(第二部分)[C];2005年
2 王策;邹立言;;论审判委员会制度改革[A];司法体制改革专题研讨会论文集[C];2005年
3 宁静波;;法院的“产出”效率问题分析——基于30个基层法院的实证分析[A];2012年度(第十届)中国法经济学论坛论文集[C];2012年
4 孙笑侠;;司法权的本质是判断权——司法权与行政权的十大区别[A];依法治国专题研究——司法改革与依法治国理论研讨会、中国农村基层民主法制建设理论研讨会论文集[C];1999年
5 欧丹;;农村刑事纠纷解决机制探析——刑事和解制度的新课题[A];2011广东社会科学学术年会——地方政府职能与社会公共管理论文集[C];2011年
6 欧丹;;农村刑事纠纷解决之场域分析——刑事和解制度的新课题[A];地方政府发展研究(第七辑2011)[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 江西省婺源县人民法院 詹菊生;“判”乃法官思维[N];人民法院报;2010年
2 陕西省委党校法学教研部副教授 潘怀平;陕甘宁边区的司法理念与实践[N];人民法院报;2011年
3 江苏省东台市人民法院 许建兵 薛忠勋;“效应”现象对法官思维的启示[N];人民法院报;2011年
4 游振辉;司法行政化何时了[N];法制日报;2004年
5 陈林 张春萍;也论“司法行政化”[N];江苏经济报;2000年
6 记者 张慧宁 通讯员 严万全;青海高院开展集中教育培训周活动[N];人民法院报;2010年
7 北京大学法学院教授 徐爱国;法官思维决定法院文化的特点[N];人民法院报;2010年
8 ;法官是怎样思考的?[N];人民法院报;2002年
9 上海法律学者 游伟;缓解“案多人少”人员向“一线”倾斜[N];人民法院报;2010年
10 洪丹;向三鹿索赔不立案确需解释[N];南方日报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 刘华俊;知识产权诉讼制度研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
2 孙加锋;南京国民政府民事诉讼法研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
3 刘晓ng;乡村人民法庭研究[D];武汉大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 樊纪德;法官思维方式探析[D];山东大学;2011年
2 李子林;司法行政化问题研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
3 唐时华;司法与媒体之现状及双赢思考[D];西南政法大学;2010年
4 何震欣;当代中国法官思维研究[D];广西师范大学;2011年
5 赵良悦;我国司法行政化问题检视[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
6 于丽芬;论司法行政化及其对策[D];辽宁师范大学;2003年
7 苏江红;试论法官思维与司法三段论[D];西南政法大学;2011年
8 尤顺然;论裁判统一的实现方式[D];华南理工大学;2010年
9 攀星;民事诉讼法中的司法地方化现象及其消解[D];西南政法大学;2011年
10 王桂宁;司法的中国语境与经验[D];西南政法大学;2010年
,本文编号:2381279
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2381279.html