法律继受中的“制度器物化”批判——以近代中国司法制度设计思路为中心
发布时间：2018-12-15 21:54
【摘要】：在帝制中国,君遵君道,臣尽臣道,相互合作,共同构成"治道"。它只有职能分工,不存在权力分立。司法是各级官府的核心职能,用"司法官兼理行政"比"行政官兼理司法"归纳官府职能更准确。在近代法律继受过程中,改革者将传统衙署归于行政范畴,新设各级审判衙门,考选合格的法官行使司法权。这种忽略固有治道的制度创设具有明显的"制度器物化"特征。继受主体缺乏国族自觉,直接导致近代司法权威难以真正确立,妨碍从功能和精神层面进行理想的法律继受。
[Abstract]:In imperial China, the monarch obeys the monarch, and the ministers cooperate with each other. It has only the division of functions, there is no division of power. The administration of justice is the core function of all levels of government. In the course of the succession of modern laws, the reformers classified the traditional government offices into the administrative category, set up new levels to try the Yamen, and selected qualified judges to exercise judicial power. The creation of this system of ignoring the inherent governance has obvious characteristics of "institutional materialization". The lack of national consciousness of secondary subject directly leads to the difficulty of establishing judicial authority in modern times and hinders the ideal legal succession from the functional and spiritual aspects.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“《资政院第二次常年会会议记录》辑佚与研究” 北京市社会科学基金项目“晚清资政院研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2381345
[Abstract]:In imperial China, the monarch obeys the monarch, and the ministers cooperate with each other. It has only the division of functions, there is no division of power. The administration of justice is the core function of all levels of government. In the course of the succession of modern laws, the reformers classified the traditional government offices into the administrative category, set up new levels to try the Yamen, and selected qualified judges to exercise judicial power. The creation of this system of ignoring the inherent governance has obvious characteristics of "institutional materialization". The lack of national consciousness of secondary subject directly leads to the difficulty of establishing judicial authority in modern times and hinders the ideal legal succession from the functional and spiritual aspects.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“《资政院第二次常年会会议记录》辑佚与研究” 北京市社会科学基金项目“晚清资政院研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 常廷彬;;试论特定继受人与既判力主体范围扩张[J];社会科学;2010年08期
2 赵沛沛;;诉讼承担之既判力思考——对当事人恒定主义和诉讼继受主义的评析[J];韶关学院学报(社会科学);2006年08期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 丁伟;论特定诉讼继受[D];华东政法大学;2014年
，本文编号：2381345
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2381345.html
