社会管理创新为何需要司法建议制度——基于司法建议案例的实证研究

发布时间：2019-03-06 20:32

【摘要】：中国法院基于自身的能力、经验等和社会责任,为了预防风险与未来可能产生的损害,在法律规定的解决纠纷的职责之外,还从事司法建议的活动,进而也使司法建议工作成为法院参与社会管理的重要形式。从《人民法院报》刊登的26份优秀司法建议书的内容与背景来看,法院的司法建议工作主要是基于案件当事人、行业协会、政府主管部门等主体缺乏对于裁判信息的获取能力和将上述信息转化为行为的能力,以及相关行为举措效果不佳的现实背景而开展的。在法治建设不断进步的背景下,司法建议应以提升社会主体对裁判信息的获取、转化、落实能力为出发点,其重点应从个体性案件转向类型化案件、整体性情势的梳理与研究,提出制度性的预防、规范、管理方案与对策,以成为推动社会管理创新的重要力量。
[Abstract]:The Chinese courts, based on their own capabilities, experience, and social responsibility, engage in judicial advice activities in addition to their legal duty to resolve disputes in order to prevent risks and possible future damage. Furthermore, judicial advice has become an important form of court participation in social management. Judging from the contents and background of the 26 excellent judicial proposals published in the Journal of the people's Court, the judicial advice work of the court is mainly based on the parties to the case, trade associations, The government departments and other subjects lack the ability to obtain and translate the above information into behavior, as well as the actual background of the poor effect of the relevant behavior measures. Under the background of continuous progress in the construction of rule of law, judicial advice should be based on improving the ability of social subjects to obtain, transform and implement adjudicative information, and its emphasis should be shifted from individual cases to typed cases, and the overall situation should be combed and studied. In order to promote the innovation of social management, institutional prevention, standardization, management schemes and countermeasures are put forward.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;苏州市中级人民法院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“虚假广告的法律治理研究”(项目编号:10JYA820055)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】