论侦查监督中宽严相济刑事政策的适用

发布时间：2019-05-18 12:09

【摘要】：随着时代的变迁、社会的变革,国家的刑事政策也会随着发生巨大的变化。新形势下,我国正处于经济发展的重要时期,构建和谐社会的关键时期,因此在整个刑事司法体系中采用宽严相济的刑事政策无疑是一个合乎时代发展的选择,是符合社会利益的选择。宽严相济的刑事政策有利于构建构建和谐社会、缓和社会矛盾、协调社会各方利益,最终有利于推动整个法治建设的发展。本文一共分为三个部分,主要论述了宽严相济的刑事政策在侦查监督工作中的适用。本文的第一章首先详细的阐述了宽严相济的刑事政策。先从背景出发,介绍了宽严相济刑事政策的提出的历史背景。在结合最高检、最高院的相关文件,解读了宽严相济的形势政策的具体内涵以及基本要求。随后,探索法学理论,阐述了宽严相济的刑事政策的理论基础,以及其与西方“轻轻重重”的刑事政策实质相同的价值取向。在本章的最后,笔者认为,新形势下,宽严相济的刑事政策有助于我国构建和谐社会、协调社会各方利益,有助于维护社会稳定。本文的第二章结合实际,详尽的分析了我国目前在侦查监督的实践中存在的障碍及问题。首先,本文先从理论角度介绍了究竟何为侦查监督体系。然后,结合目前的执法、司法实践,分析了当前情况下侦查机关、检察机关在面对侦查监督程序中,仍然存在着不小的障碍,而且这些障碍来自于多个方面。既有观念层次的障碍,立法层次的障碍以及制度上的局限性等等。由于这些障碍的存在,导致目前宽严相济的刑事政策并没有得到切实有效的落实和贯彻,当宽则宽、当严则严的要求也并没有完成。本文的第三章献计献策,结合上文指出的诸多实践中的问题,为宽严相济的刑事政策的贯彻落实提出切实有效的建议。首先,需要更新执法理念,树立保护人权的全新的法治理念。其次,笔者认为,一方面可以通过完善立法来明确逮捕的证据要求,明确逮捕的证明标准来提高侦查监督,另一方面也可以在现有的立法中寻找出路,检察机关积极介入侦查等方式,切实有效的提高法律监督的力度。最后,笔者还提出了一些创新举措,来帮助完善整个侦查监督体系,并力求在侦查监督体系中全面贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策。由于资料收集的有限性,加之本人写作能力及知识水平的有限性,对宽严相济的某些问题的研究可能还停留在基础阶段。另外,笔者的研究仅仅涉及侦查环节中宽严相济的几个方面,未能包括宽严相济制度的所有方面和细节,这些问题都是我们将来需要继续研究解决的问题。
[Abstract]:With the changes of the times and the changes of society, the criminal policy of the country will also change greatly. Under the new situation, our country is in an important period of economic development and the key period of building a harmonious society, so it is undoubtedly a choice for the development of the times to adopt the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity in the whole criminal justice system. It is a choice in line with the interests of society. The criminal policy of combining leniency with severity is conducive to building a harmonious society, easing social contradictions, coordinating the interests of all parties in society, and ultimately promoting the development of the whole construction of the rule of law. This paper is divided into three parts, mainly discusses the application of the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity in the investigation and supervision. In the first chapter of this paper, the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity is expounded in detail. Starting from the background, this paper introduces the historical background of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity. Combined with the relevant documents of the Supreme Inspection and the Supreme Court, this paper interprets the specific connotation and basic requirements of the situation policy of combining leniency with severity. Then, it explores the theory of law, expounds the theoretical basis of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, and its value orientation which is the same as the essence of the criminal policy of "gently heavy" in the West. At the end of this chapter, the author believes that under the new situation, the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity is helpful to build a harmonious society, coordinate the interests of all parties in society and maintain social stability. The second chapter of this paper analyzes the obstacles and problems in the practice of investigation and supervision in detail. First of all, this paper first introduces what is the investigation supervision system from the theoretical point of view. Then, combined with the current law enforcement and judicial practice, this paper analyzes the current situation of investigation organs, procuratorial organs in the face of investigation supervision procedures, there are still many obstacles, and these obstacles come from many aspects. There are existing obstacles at the conceptual level, obstacles at the legislative level and institutional limitations, and so on. Due to the existence of these obstacles, the current criminal policy of combining leniency with severity has not been effectively implemented and implemented, when leniency is wide, when strict and strict requirements have not been completed. The third chapter of this paper provides suggestions, combined with many practical problems pointed out above, to put forward practical and effective suggestions for the implementation of the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity. First of all, it is necessary to update the concept of law enforcement and establish a new concept of rule of law for the protection of human rights. Secondly, the author believes that, on the one hand, we can improve the evidence requirements of arrest and the standard of proof of arrest to improve the investigation and supervision, on the other hand, we can also find a way out in the existing legislation. Procuratorial organs actively intervene in investigation and other ways to effectively improve the intensity of legal supervision. Finally, the author also puts forward some innovative measures to help improve the whole investigation supervision system, and strive to fully implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity in the investigation supervision system. Due to the limitation of data collection, as well as the limitation of my writing ability and knowledge level, the research on some problems of leniency may still stay in the basic stage. In addition, the author's research only involves a few aspects of the combination of leniency and severity in the investigation link, and fails to include all the aspects and details of the leniency system. These problems are the problems that we need to continue to study and solve in the future.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926.34;D924

【参考文献】