“两个证据规定”对反贪工作的影响与对策
发布时间：2019-06-24 19:20
【摘要】：证据是刑事诉讼制度的一个重要组成部分，对证据的调取是侦查部门的工作重点。反贪案件有着区别于其他刑事案件的特殊性，对于侦查取证更有特殊要求。我国现行的刑事诉讼法中有关侦查取证的条文无法满足侦查部门，特别是反贪部门的实际需要。“两个证据规定”立足于中国国情、现行法律规定和司法解释，根据审判实践，借鉴了英美法系和大陆法系证据法的最新思想，同时也结合国内刑事诉讼法专家的最新研究成果,提出了一些有益的规则。“两个证据规定”的出台是我国刑事诉讼制度特别是证据制度的重大发展，，它涉及到了中国刑事诉讼法的整体架构。其中某些内容已运用到新修订的《刑事诉讼法》之中，而传统的反贪侦查仍存在诸多弊端，侦查模式、人员素质和法律水平均没有达到要求。本文将以反贪工作实践出发，通过论述“两个证据规定”颁行的进步意义，从对“两个证据规定”对反贪工作存在传统办案模式冲击、立案前证据认定、言词证据的合法性、实物证据的合法性和瑕疵证据可采信等五个方面的影响入手进行多角度探讨，并提出“两个证据规定”实施中反贪工作相应的改革对策。
[Abstract]:Evidence is an important part of criminal procedure system, and the transfer of evidence is the focus of investigation department. Anti-corruption cases are different from other criminal cases, and have special requirements for investigation and evidence collection. The provisions on investigation and evidence collection in the current criminal procedure law of our country can not meet the actual needs of the investigation department, especially the anti-corruption department. Based on the national conditions of China, the current legal provisions and judicial interpretation, according to the trial practice, this paper draws lessons from the latest ideas of the evidence law of the common law system and the civil law system, and also puts forward some useful rules combined with the latest research results of the experts in the domestic criminal procedure law. The introduction of "two provisions of evidence" is an important development of the criminal procedure system, especially the evidence system in China, which involves the overall structure of China's Criminal procedure Law. Some of these contents have been applied to the newly revised Criminal procedure Law, but the traditional anti-corruption investigation still has many drawbacks, and the investigation mode, personnel quality and legal level have not met the requirements. Based on the practice of anti-corruption work, this paper discusses the progressive significance of the promulgation of the "two evidence provisions", and probes into the impact of the "two evidence provisions" on the traditional case handling mode, the identification of evidence before filing, the legality of verbal evidence, the legitimacy of physical evidence and the acceptability of defective evidence from five aspects, such as the impact of the "two evidence provisions" on the anti-corruption work, the confirmation of evidence before filing, the legitimacy of physical evidence and the acceptability of defective evidence. And put forward the corresponding reform countermeasures of anti-corruption work in the implementation of the two evidence provisions.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2505303
[Abstract]:Evidence is an important part of criminal procedure system, and the transfer of evidence is the focus of investigation department. Anti-corruption cases are different from other criminal cases, and have special requirements for investigation and evidence collection. The provisions on investigation and evidence collection in the current criminal procedure law of our country can not meet the actual needs of the investigation department, especially the anti-corruption department. Based on the national conditions of China, the current legal provisions and judicial interpretation, according to the trial practice, this paper draws lessons from the latest ideas of the evidence law of the common law system and the civil law system, and also puts forward some useful rules combined with the latest research results of the experts in the domestic criminal procedure law. The introduction of "two provisions of evidence" is an important development of the criminal procedure system, especially the evidence system in China, which involves the overall structure of China's Criminal procedure Law. Some of these contents have been applied to the newly revised Criminal procedure Law, but the traditional anti-corruption investigation still has many drawbacks, and the investigation mode, personnel quality and legal level have not met the requirements. Based on the practice of anti-corruption work, this paper discusses the progressive significance of the promulgation of the "two evidence provisions", and probes into the impact of the "two evidence provisions" on the traditional case handling mode, the identification of evidence before filing, the legality of verbal evidence, the legitimacy of physical evidence and the acceptability of defective evidence from five aspects, such as the impact of the "two evidence provisions" on the anti-corruption work, the confirmation of evidence before filing, the legitimacy of physical evidence and the acceptability of defective evidence. And put forward the corresponding reform countermeasures of anti-corruption work in the implementation of the two evidence provisions.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑震;两种侦查模式的比较研究[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2004年03期
2 樊崇义;;“两个证据规定”理解与适用中的几个问题[J];证据科学;2010年05期
3 申夫,石英;刑事诉讼中“瑕疵证据”的法律效力探讨[J];法学评论;1998年05期
4 龙宗智;威胁、引诱、欺骗的审讯是否违法[J];法学;2000年03期
5 罗同昱;;“两个证据规定”构建了我国的刑事证据规则体系[J];法制与社会;2011年06期
6 刘玫;郑曦;;关于两个“证据规定”的评析[J];西部法学评论;2010年05期
7 潘少莹;;从两个“证据规定”看反贪工作侦查模式的转变[J];法制与社会;2010年34期
8 宋英辉;;检察机关贯彻“两个证据规定”的几个问题[J];中国检察官;2011年01期
9 龙宗智;;取证主体合法性若干问题[J];法学研究;2007年03期
10 闫寒梅;谈瑕疵证据的法律效力[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2002年05期
本文编号：2505303
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2505303.html
