论公司治理的公共性——从私人契约向公共干预的进化

发布时间：2018-01-14 14:01

本文关键词：论公司治理的公共性——从私人契约向公共干预的进化　出处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：公司法以及公司治理实践的发展,已在很大程度上突破了产权逻辑。公司治理不仅是股东供给的私人秩序,还是一种日益受到外在公共干预的社会治理形态。基于法律、公众、政治权力以及法院的干预,公司治理日益表现出作为公共秩序的一面——诸如,股东地位特殊性的淡化、契约性的弱化以及治理重心的趋外部化等,均是此种公共干预的集中展现。对公司治理的公共干预将使"透明度提升"成为公司治理改进的核心——为此,闭锁公司和公共公司的信息披露义务会进一步扩张,柔性"对话式"的信息披露会得到更多重视,信息披露应从关注财务转向报告风险,公司监控机制的委派也应"公共化"。总之,尽管"股东霸权"仍将是公司内部最基本的权利分配逻辑,但局限于从公司内部力量和权力组合的角度探讨公司治理,是一种狭隘的观念。社会变化、公共干预导致公司治理呈现出越来越强的公共性,必须从"私人秩序"和"公共秩序"双重维度去理解其构成,才能全面把握公司治理的演变途径——从私人契约向公共干预的进化。
[Abstract]:The development of company law and corporate governance practice has broken through the logic of property right to a great extent. Corporate governance is not only the private order of shareholder supply. Based on the intervention of law, public, political power and the court, corporate governance is increasingly shown as one side of public order-such as. The dilution of the particularity of shareholder status, the weakening of contract and the externalization of governance center. Public intervention in corporate governance will make "transparency" the core of corporate governance improvement. The obligations of information disclosure of locked companies and public companies will be further expanded, flexible "dialogue" information disclosure will be paid more attention to, information disclosure should be changed from focusing on financial risks to reporting risks. In short, although "shareholder hegemony" will still be the most basic logic of power distribution within the company. However, it is a narrow concept to discuss corporate governance from the angle of internal power and power combination. Social change and public intervention lead to more and more public corporate governance. In order to grasp the evolution of corporate governance, the evolution from private contract to public intervention must be understood from the two dimensions of "private order" and "public order".
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(10AFX013)
【分类号】：D912.29
【正文快照】： 讨论公司治理问题以“所有权”为起点,并假定从一定的权利和索取权出发是彻底错误的。[1]4———玛格丽特·M·布莱尔长期以来,公司治理被视为一种股东之间的“私人秩序”(private order),或由股东主导形成的“私人安排”(private arrangement),公司治理系统因此成为由股东群

【参考文献】