论股东停止侵害请求权——以司法救济为线索

发布时间：2018-02-03 10:36

本文关键词： 公司法股东权保护停止侵害请求权司法救济　出处：《法商研究》2008年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：公司法上的停止侵害请求权制度来源于民法,其价值诉求是以较小的成本阻止较大的损害发生。停止侵害请求权制度对公司内部有缺陷的治理制度具有重要的弥补作用。在制度设计上,股东停止侵害请求权的行使主体除了股东以外,基于我国公司治理中监事会权力虚置的现状,还应将监事列为行使主体;股东停止侵害请求权请求制止的范围只能是违反法律、法规的行为和章程禁止的行为,违反一般性的注意义务和需要具体裁量的忠实义务的行为不应纳入制止范围;股东停止侵害请求权请求制止的对象为董事、监事、高级管理人员;股东停止侵害请求权的救济措施是对没有停止实施相关行为的被申请人直接推定其行为具有过错,要求其承担损害赔偿的责任。
[Abstract]:The system of the right to stop infringing in the company law comes from the civil law. Its value demand is to prevent the occurrence of larger damage at a lower cost. The system of stop infringement claims has an important role to make up for the defective governance system within the company. In addition to shareholders, the exercise of shareholders' right to stop infringing claims is based on the fact that the power of the board of supervisors in corporate governance in our country is empty, and the supervisors should also be listed as the exercise subjects. The scope of the request for stopping the shareholders' right to stop infringement can only be in violation of laws and regulations and prohibited by the articles of association. Violations of general obligations of care and obligations of loyalty requiring specific discretion should not be included in the scope of suppression; The object of the shareholders' request for stopping the infringement claim is the directors, supervisors and senior management personnel; The remedy for shareholders to stop infringing claims is to assume that the defendant who has not stopped carrying out related actions has fault in his behavior and demands that he bear the responsibility of compensation for damages.
【作者单位】：湖南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D912.29
【正文快照】： 一、停止侵害请求权的民法学渊源在传统民法中,对权利进行救济的主要途径是通过侵权法上的损害赔偿责任制度来实现对受害人的利益救济,但是,由于承担损害赔偿责任是以构成严格的侵权责任为前提的,同时由于事后救济存在诸多缺陷,因此,为了达到对受害人权益更加周延的保护,传统

【参考文献】