有限责任公司僵局司法救济制度探析

发布时间：2018-02-12 16:27

本文关键词： 公司僵局司法救济有限责任公司　出处：《华东政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 有限责任公司由于其人合性的本质属性以及公司内部治理结构的缺陷,容易出现公司僵局。有限责任公司僵局一旦产生,将会给公司、股东、利益相关者及社会带来很大的危害。因此,在公司治理机制自身无法发挥作用的情况下,就必须借助于司法救济手段来破解有限责任公司僵局。我国于2005年修订的《公司法》赋予股东在公司出现僵局时,有请求人民法院解散公司的权利。随后,《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定(二)》对司法解散公司制度作了更为详细的解释。但我国确立股东提起解散公司诉讼制度的时间比较短,仍需在司法实践中不断加以完善。本文通过探析公司僵局的基本问题及形成原因,论证司法介入有限责任公司僵局的合理性。同时,本文试图在分析各国为破解公司僵局构建的多种司法救济制度的基础上,探索我国有限责任公司僵局司法救济制度的完善。本文分为以下四部分: 第一部分主要探析公司僵局的基本问题。本部分阐述了公司僵局的概念、特点、类型和危害,为在司法实践中准确把握公司僵局打下了基础。第二部分主要分析司法介入有限责任公司僵局的合理性。本部分指出有限责任公司的固有特性是造成公司僵局的根本原因。因此有限责任公司僵局一旦产生,将很难依靠自身力量予以破解。同时由于公司章程、调解制度、仲裁制度或多或少存在着一定的局限性。因此,司法介入有限责任公司僵局是十分可行并且必要的。第三部分主要研究了四种公司僵局司法救济制度。本部分介绍了司法解散公司制度、强制股权收购制度、任命临时董事制度和指定财产管理人制度的立法规定,并分析了四种制度的利弊之处。第四部分主要对完善我国有限责任公司僵局司法救济制度提出了相关建议。本部分建议应当在立法上完善司法解散公司制度并且在我国构建强制股权收购制度。此外,本部分还从司法实务层面探讨了法院处理有限责任公司僵局案件时应具有的原则和思路以及如何认定可予解散的公司僵局,并强调应当注重发挥法院的司法调解作用。
[Abstract]:Limited liability companies are prone to corporate deadlock due to their inherent human nature and defects in their internal governance structure. Once the deadlock of a limited liability company comes into being, it will be given to the company and its shareholders. The stakeholders and the society bring great harm, therefore, when the corporate governance mechanism itself can not play a role, we must resort to judicial remedies to solve the deadlock of limited liability companies. The Company Law, amended in 2005, gives shareholders the right to hold a deadlock in the company. Subsequently, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (2) made a more detailed explanation of the system of judicial dissolution of the company. It is relatively short for shareholders to establish a system of litigation for the dissolution of a company. It still needs to be perfected in judicial practice. By analyzing the basic problems of corporate deadlock and the reasons for its formation, this paper demonstrates the rationality of judicial intervention in the deadlock of limited liability companies. At the same time, this paper attempts to analyze the various judicial relief systems constructed by various countries in order to break the corporate deadlock. To explore the perfection of judicial remedy system of limited liability company deadlock in our country. This paper is divided into the following four parts:. The first part mainly analyzes the basic problems of corporate deadlock. This part expounds the concept, characteristics, types and hazards of corporate deadlock, which lays a foundation for accurately grasping the corporate deadlock in judicial practice. The second part mainly analyzes the rationality of judicial intervention in the limited liability company deadlock. This part points out that the inherent characteristics of the limited liability company is the root cause of the corporate deadlock. At the same time, because of the company articles of association, mediation system and arbitration system, there are some limitations. Therefore, judicial intervention in the deadlock of limited liability companies is very feasible and necessary. The third part mainly studies four kinds of judicial relief system of corporate deadlock. This part introduces the legislative provisions of judicial dissolution of company system, compulsory ownership acquisition system, appointment of temporary directors system and appointed property manager system. And analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the four systems. In the 4th part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the judicial remedy system of the deadlock of limited liability companies in our country. In addition, this part suggests that the judicial dissolution of the company system should be improved in legislation and the system of compulsory equity acquisition should be established in our country. This part also discusses the principles and ideas that the court should have when dealing with the limited liability company deadlock case from the judicial practice level, and how to determine the corporate deadlock that can be dissolved, and emphasizes that we should pay attention to the judicial mediation role of the court.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】