股东派生诉讼制度的法律研究

发布时间：2018-02-26 13:26

本文关键词： 股东派生诉讼前置程序法律后果　出处：《南昌大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：股东派生诉讼制度是我国的一种新型诉讼制度,我国于2005年才将其写入法律当中。它起源于英国,发展于美国,是指公司不积极起诉侵害公司利益的行为,符合条件的股东提起为了公司合法利益而却以自己的名义启动的诉讼。由于股东派生诉讼制度的特殊性及新型性,致使其虽然被我国法律所采纳,但是对于派生诉讼制度的规定还是略有不足,不太完善的。本文一共分为四章。第一章首先对股东派生诉讼制度进行了概括性的论述；第二章则将股东派生诉讼制度与相关的诉讼制度比较研究,以更好地理解股东代表诉讼制度的内涵和外延；第三章主要立足于我国当代法律发展的状况,阐述了我国派生诉讼制度在立法和司法实践方面的现状,通过对我国立法现状和司法现状的研究,发现我国股东派生诉讼制度在当事人资格、前置程序、诉讼费用担保、法律后果等方面存在着一些不足；第四章则是针对我国派生诉讼制度存在的缺陷不全,提出相对完善的几点建议,以期在未来的立法和司法中我国股东派生诉讼制度能够得到更好的发展及运用。相信随着我国法律制度的不断完善,司法实践中此类诉讼出现的机率提高,在股东派生诉讼制度方面的立法和司法规定也会日趋成熟。
[Abstract]:The shareholder derivative litigation system is a new kind of litigation system in our country, which was only written into the law in 2005. It originated in Britain and developed in the United States, which means that the company does not actively sue against the interests of the company. The eligible shareholders bring a lawsuit initiated in their own name for the legitimate interests of the company. Because of the particularity and new-type nature of the shareholder derivative litigation system, although it is adopted by the law of our country, However, the provisions of derivative litigation system are still a little inadequate, not very perfect. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter discusses the shareholder derivative litigation system, the second chapter compares the shareholder derivative litigation system with the related litigation system. To better understand the connotation and extension of shareholder representative litigation system; The third chapter is mainly based on the development of contemporary law in our country, elaborated the current situation of the derivative litigation system in legislation and judicial practice, through the study of the current situation of legislation and judicial status in China. It is found that there are some deficiencies in the shareholder derivative litigation system in the aspects of the qualification of the parties, the pre-procedure, the guarantee of litigation expenses, the legal consequences and so on. Chapter 4th is aimed at the defects of the derivative litigation system in China, and puts forward several suggestions to improve the system. It is hoped that in the future legislation and judicature, the shareholder derivative litigation system of our country will be better developed and applied. I believe that with the continuous improvement of the legal system in our country, the probability of such litigation in judicial practice will be increased. The legislative and judicial provisions in the shareholder derivative litigation system will also become more mature.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91;D925.1

【参考文献】