股东代表诉讼制度研究
本文选题:股东代表诉讼 切入点:诉讼当事人 出处:《上海大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着我国公司制度的逐步发展,以及受国外从20世纪90年代开始的公司法改革运动之影响,国内学者纷纷开始讨论域外的股东代表诉讼制度。为顺应法制发展趋势,2005年,我国修订《公司法》时确立了股东代表诉讼。但很多实践中会出现的疑问我国《公司法》都没有做出明确的规定,如关于公司在诉讼中的法律地位问题、前置程序中的紧急情况包括哪些具体情形、是否可以豁免等,这些都是《公司法》上的空白。 立法中的股东代表诉讼是否起到我们原先预期的作用,,还有那些需要完善的地方?笔者收集了部分我国的股东代表诉讼实践案例,并加以整理分析。结合案例分析股东代表诉讼,以及其在我国司法实践中遇到的问题,提出了完善的建议。文章一共分为五章。 第一章:从股东代表诉讼制度的概念、该制度与一般民事诉讼不同的特征、该制度的作用等方面进行了分析阐述。 第二章:分析我国股东代表诉讼的立法背景及现状,寻找司法实践的可用依据;通过分析案例情况,介绍我国股东代表诉讼的实施现状,形成初步认识。 第三章:结合实践情况,具体分析我国股东代表诉讼制度的各方面。主要内容有:股东代表诉讼的当事人,如原被告的资格、公司和其他股东在诉讼中的地位;关于前置程序的可豁免情形;判决后原、被告股东应承担的责任等。 第四章:介绍国外关于股东代表诉讼的相关立法,并加以比较分析,为我国股东代表诉讼的完善提供思路。 第五章:总结分析实践中遇到的问题,并在此基础上提出了一些建议,如明确公司在诉讼中的地位、引进费用补偿制度等。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of the company system in our country and the influence of the reform of company law in foreign countries since 1990s, domestic scholars have begun to discuss the foreign shareholder representative litigation system in succession. In order to conform to the trend of legal development, in 2005, domestic scholars began to discuss the foreign shareholder representative litigation system. The shareholder's representative action was established when the Company Law was amended in China. However, many of the questions that will arise in practice are not clearly stipulated in the Company Law of China, such as the legal status of the company in the litigation. The emergency in the front procedure includes the specific circumstances, whether the immunity can be granted, and these are the gaps in the Company Law. Does the shareholder's representative litigation in the legislation play the role we had originally expected, and what needs to be improved? The author collects some cases of shareholder's representative litigation in China and analyzes them. Combined with the case, the author analyzes the shareholder's representative litigation and the problems encountered in our country's judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions. The article is divided into five chapters. The first chapter analyzes the concept of shareholder representative litigation system, the different characteristics of the system from the general civil action, the function of the system and so on. The second chapter analyzes the legislative background and current situation of shareholder representative litigation in our country, and finds out the basis of judicial practice. Through the analysis of cases, it introduces the implementation status of shareholder representative litigation in our country and forms a preliminary understanding. Chapter three: according to the practice, the author analyzes the aspects of the shareholder representative litigation system in China. The main contents are as follows: the parties of the shareholder representative action, such as the original defendant's qualification, the position of the company and other shareholders in the lawsuit; As to the immunity of pre-procedure, the liability of the defendant shareholder after judgment, etc. Chapter 4th: introduce the relevant legislation about shareholder's representative litigation in foreign countries, and compare and analyze it, and provide the train of thought for the perfection of shareholder's representative lawsuit in our country. Chapter 5th: summarizes and analyzes the problems encountered in practice, and puts forward some suggestions on this basis, such as clarifying the position of the company in litigation, introducing the system of compensation for expenses, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:上海大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 甘培忠;论股东派生诉讼在中国的有效适用[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年05期
2 张昊;李震东;;论董事责任的豁免机制[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
3 王千华,林晖;上市公司中小股东利益的保护与我国《公司法》的修订[J];当代法学;2001年04期
4 傅穹;曹理;;股东派生诉讼提起权滥用防止研究——兼评2005年《公司法》的相关规定[J];当代法学;2006年02期
5 蔡立东;;论股东派生诉讼中被告的范围[J];当代法学;2007年01期
6 李玫;;论股东派生诉讼在我国公司法中的引入与适用[J];国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报);2008年05期
7 孟祥刚;;公司股东代表诉讼的审理[J];法律适用;2007年04期
8 甘培忠;有限责任公司小股东利益保护的法学思考——从诉讼视角考察[J];法商研究;2002年06期
9 颜运秋;公司利益相关者派生诉讼的理论逻辑与制度构建[J];法商研究;2005年06期
10 刘俊海;;论股权平等原则[J];法学杂志;2008年03期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 刘冬京;我国股东派生诉讼制度研究[D];武汉大学;2009年
2 胡宜奎;股东代表诉讼中的公司参加问题研究[D];南京大学;2011年
3 刘金华;股东代位诉讼制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
4 李浩;股东派生诉讼研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
本文编号:1572823
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1572823.html