当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

股东诉权滥用及其法律规制

发布时间:2018-03-06 23:34

  本文选题:股东诉讼 切入点:诉权滥用 出处:《安徽大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:《公司法》赋予股东广泛的诉权,为遏制大股东滥用控制权,保障公司及中小股东利益提供了有效的法律保障。但由于我国正处于社会转型期,人们的诚信意识缺失,加之立法不完善,导致股东滥用诉权现象时有发生。如不加以规制,必然严重侵害公司和其他股东的合法权益、浪费司法资源,而且也是对正当股东诉权的伤害和对司法公正与权威的冲击。股东滥用诉权,违背了诚实信用原则和正当程序原则,本质上是一种权利滥用行为,是一种侵权行为。如何既能保障股东的正当诉权,又能防止股东滥用诉讼,是各国公司法学者和立法者为之奋斗的永恒课题。各国在实体法和程序法上对股东滥用诉权进行了全方位限制,为我们提供了借鉴与参考。 在我国,作为基本程序法的民事诉讼法并没有就滥用诉权问题作出明文规定,公司法考虑的也不是很全面完善,这不能不说是我国立法的缺憾。无论是从民事诉讼目的及公司健康发展角度来讲,还是从诉讼资源的有限性及构建社会主义和谐社会角度来讲,我国立法均应对股东滥用诉权行为予以规制。完善我国股东诉权滥用制度,保障公司健康发展,应以诚实信用原则、正当程序理念和禁止权利滥用理念为基础,完善民事诉讼法及公司法相关规定,强化法院审判职能,并对相应的行为予以法律制裁。
[Abstract]:The Company Law gives shareholders a wide range of litigation rights, which provides an effective legal guarantee to curb the abuse of control rights by large shareholders and to protect the interests of companies and small and medium shareholders. However, due to the fact that our country is in the period of social transformation, people's sense of honesty is lacking. Coupled with imperfect legislation, the phenomenon of shareholders abusing the right of action occurs from time to time. If not regulated, it will inevitably seriously infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of the company and other shareholders, and waste judicial resources. It is also an injury to the right of action of legitimate shareholders and an impact on judicial justice and authority. The abuse of the right of action by shareholders violates the principles of good faith and due process, and is essentially an act of abuse of rights. It is a kind of tort. How to protect the shareholders' legitimate right of action and prevent the shareholders from abusing the lawsuit, It is an eternal task for the scholars and legislators of company law of various countries to struggle for it. Countries have restricted shareholders' abuse of litigation rights in substantive law and procedural law in all directions, which provides us with reference and reference. In our country, the Civil procedure Law, as the basic procedural law, has not made explicit provisions on the abuse of the right of action, and the company law is not very comprehensive and perfect. This cannot but be said to be a shortcoming of our legislation. Not only from the point of view of the purpose of civil litigation and the healthy development of the company, but also from the point of view of the limitation of litigation resources and the construction of a harmonious socialist society. The legislation of our country should regulate the abuse of the right of action by shareholders, perfect the system of abuse of the right of action of shareholders in our country, and ensure the healthy development of the company, which should be based on the principle of good faith, the idea of due process and the idea of prohibiting abuse of rights. Improve the civil procedure law and the relevant provisions of the company law, strengthen the court trial function, and the corresponding acts of legal sanctions.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 彭海青;对民事诉讼适用诚信原则的质疑[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2000年04期

2 王福华;两大法系中诉之利益理论的程序价值[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年05期

3 张家慧;诉权意义的回复——诉讼法与实体法关系的理论基点[J];法学评论;2000年02期

4 黄一芸;吴东锋;;诚实信用原则这一帝王条款在民事诉讼法领域的尴尬[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2006年02期

5 汤维建;沈磊;;论诉权滥用及其法律规制[J];山东警察学院学报;2007年02期

6 陈瑞华;;程序正义论纲[J];诉讼法论丛;1998年01期

7 江伟;单国军;;关于诉权的若干问题的研究[J];诉讼法论丛;1998年01期

8 博克哈德·汉斯;张艳;;德国和奥地利的程序滥用制度[J];诉讼法论丛;2001年00期

9 徐静村,刘荣军;纠纷解决与法[J];现代法学;1999年03期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 卢政峰;股东诉讼制度研究[D];吉林大学;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 杨银萍;诉权保障研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年

2 张占地;论民事诉权滥用的法律规则[D];辽宁大学;2008年

3 卢东;民事诉权滥用及其法律规制研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年



本文编号:1577013

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1577013.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户dc275***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com