职务侵占罪疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-18 02:43

本文选题：职务侵占 + 疑难问题　；参考：《上海交通大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：职务侵占犯罪,是一种古已有之的侵财性犯罪。职务侵占罪罪名的确立在我国刑法的历史上并不长。现实生活中，职务侵占犯罪同许多犯罪一样呈现复杂性、多样性和特殊性。司法实践中，对职务侵占罪的认定，存在许多分歧。而职务侵占罪的犯罪构成与盗窃罪、侵占罪等近似犯罪的区别仍不甚明显。从立法角度看，我国现行职务侵占罪刑事立法也存在着许多不足。本文分为四部分：第一部分是从主体认定的三种特殊情况、利用职务上的便利和非法占为己有的界定，分析职务侵占罪的构成及特征。第二部分对职务侵占罪与非罪、职务侵占罪未遂、共同犯罪等难点展开分析和论证。第三部分运用总和比较的方法，区分职务侵占罪与近似犯罪的界限，以达到准确认定职务侵占罪的目的。第四部分针对我国现行职务侵占罪立法存在的不足，，进一步完善职务侵占罪的立法建议。
[Abstract]:The crime of occupation of duty is an ancient crime of invading money.The establishment of the crime of duty embezzlement is not long in the history of criminal law of our country.In real life, the crime of occupation of duty presents complexity, diversity and particularity like many crimes.In judicial practice, there are many differences in the determination of the crime of duty embezzlement.However, the difference between the crime of duty embezzlement and the similar crimes such as theft and embezzlement is still not obvious.From the legislative point of view, there are many deficiencies in the current criminal legislation of duty embezzlement in our country.This paper is divided into four parts:The first part is to analyze the constitution and characteristics of the crime of duty embezzlement from the three special cases identified by the subject and the definition of the convenience of duty and illegal occupation of one's own.The second part analyzes and proves the difficulties of duty embezzlement crime and non-crime, attempted duty embezzlement crime and joint crime.The third part uses the method of summation comparison to distinguish the boundary between the crime of duty embezzlement and the crime of approximate crime in order to accurately identify the crime of duty embezzlement.The fourth part aims at our country present duty embezzlement crime legislation existence insufficiency, further consummates the duty embezzlement crime legislation suggestion.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】