当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

异议股东回购请求权之法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-28 06:04

  本文选题:异议股东回购请求权 + 异议股东 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:二元股权结构深沉张力下,股东经营权分离于控制权。股东所有权异质为股权,并最终演变为收益权。资本绝对化表象为资本三原则,本质为所有权与股权的分离和固化。因资本绝对原则损害异议股东利益,产生股东异质化权利保护的权利本原与手段之回归,其表现形式之一为异议股东回购请求权。我国《公司法》第74条和第142条规定异议股东回购请求权,但从规范主义探源,异议股东回购请求权呈现被请求主体狭窄,请求权主体不明,行使条件严苛,“合理价格”难以确定,程序保障不足五大问题。域外经验与我国实践分析比较,我国应扩大被请求权主体,明确请求权主体范围,放宽行使条件,综合采用价格确定模式和计算方法,完善程序保障,实现异议股东回购请求权之立法价值。本文除引言和结语外,以“概念—问题—经验分析—我国实践与问题完善”逻辑结构展开,分为四部分:第一部分,异议股东回购请求权的界定与特性分析。重点对异议股东回购回购请求权的概念进行归纳分析,总结后定义,从权利性质角度,对异议股东回购请求权特性进行分析;第二部分,从法规范的角度,分析我国异议股东回购请求权存在的上述五方面问题;第三部分,从问题的五个方面展开,进行比较分析,归纳总结,对域外经验进行介绍;第四部分,结合问题和经验,综合我国实践和域外经验分析,提出完善我国异议股东回购请求权的建议。
[Abstract]:Under the deep tension of dual ownership structure, shareholder's management right is separated from control right. Shareholder ownership heterogeneity for equity, and ultimately evolved into income rights. The absolute representation of capital is the three principles of capital, and the essence is the separation and solidification of ownership and equity. Because the absolute principle of capital damages the interests of dissenting shareholders and brings about the return of the origin and means of the protection of shareholders' heterogeneity rights, one of its manifestations is the right to repurchase claim by dissenting shareholders. Articles 74 and 142 of the Company Law of our country stipulate the claim right of dissenting shareholders to repurchase, but from the source of normalism, the claim right of dissent shareholders is narrow, the subject of claim is unclear, and the exercise conditions are harsh. "reasonable price" is difficult to determine, procedural protection is not enough five major problems. Compared with the practice of our country, our country should expand the subject of claim, define the scope of subject of claim, relax the conditions of exercise, adopt the pricing model and calculation method, and perfect the guarantee of procedure. To realize the legislative value of the right to repurchase of dissenting shareholders. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part, the definition and characteristic analysis of the claim right of dissent shareholders' repurchase with the logical structure of "Concept-Problem-Experience Analysis-practice and problem perfection in China". Focus on the concept of demerit shareholders repurchase claim, summing up the definition, from the perspective of the nature of rights, the characteristics of demerit shareholders repurchase claim; part two, from the perspective of legal norms, The third part, from the five aspects of the problem, comparative analysis, summary, introduction of the extraterritorial experience, the fourth part, combined with the problem and experience, the third part, from the five aspects of the problem, to carry out comparative analysis, summing up, the introduction of the extraterritorial experience, the fourth part, combined with the problems and experience, Based on the analysis of China's practice and overseas experience, the paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the right of demerit shareholders' repurchase claim in our country.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 李燕;郭青青;;我国类别股立法的路径选择[J];现代法学;2016年02期

2 刘胜军;;类别表决权:类别股股东保护与公司行为自由的衡平——兼评《优先股试点管理办法》第10条[J];法学评论;2015年01期

3 朱慈蕴;沈朝晖;;类别股与中国公司法的演进[J];中国社会科学;2013年09期

4 黄爱学;;异议股东收买请求权的法律性质[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2013年01期

5 张翼飞;;公司重大资产转让认定的美国标准及其启示[J];求索;2012年01期

6 乔宝杰;王兵;;论有限责任公司异议股东股份回购请求权之情势[J];法律适用;2011年10期

7 蒋云蔚;;美国法上的异议股东股份评估权制度对我国的借鉴意义[J];西南政法大学学报;2008年02期

8 高永深;;论异议股东股份回购请求权[J];河北法学;2008年04期

9 刘洁辉;试论我国类别股东表决制度的完善[J];政治与法律;2005年05期



本文编号:1814081

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1814081.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b0eab***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com