我国有限公司股东表决权问题研究
发布时间:2018-04-28 11:26
本文选题:股东表决权 + 行使原则 ; 参考:《中国社会科学院研究生院》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:美国著名公司法专家Easterbrook和Fischel曾经说过:“如果有限责任是公司法最为显著的特征,则股东表决权是公司法的第二显著特征。”这一说法指出了股东表决权在公司法律制度中的重要地位。股东表决权是股东的一项基本权利,在公司所有权与经营权相分离的经营体制下,股东表决权成为公司所有和公司控制的连接点,是股东实现自身利益的重要途径。 虽然股东表决权在股东权利中占有重要地位,但在理论界及实践中却往往被忽视,现有关于股东表决权的论述及著作中,以股份公司股东表决权内容居多,专门针对有限公司股东表决权的论著则少之又少。我国2005年修订的公司法对股东表决权制度进行了部分修订,这使股东表决权制度在立法上取得了巨大进步。但公司治理实践中也不断出现了很多新情况、新问题,有待通过法律的进一步完善予以解决。 本文从理论与实践两个方面针对对我国有限公司股东表决权制度进行分析和研究,指出我国立法现状和实践中存在的问题,并提出完善的建议,具有一定的理论价值及实践意义。本文除引言和结语外,,共分为三部分: 第一部分:解读有限公司股东表决权的基本理论。包括有限公司股东表决权的概念、性质及价值。指出有限公司股东表决权的性质是一项民事权利、固有权及股东参与经营管理的权利。 第二部分:论述有限公司股东表决权的行使原则及方式。本部分重点对有限公司股东表决权实行的二元化原则,即出资比例原则及一人一票制原则进行了论述,提出了如何利用公司章程对有限公司股东表决权做出例外规定及应按实缴出资比例行使股东表决权的立法建议。 第三部分:讲述有限公司股东表决权行使的法律后果及其救济。本部分论述了有限公司股东表决权行使的范围、结果及效力,分析了当前司法实践中当股东表决权被侵犯时可以采取的救济方式,包括提起股东会决议撤销诉讼、解散公司诉讼及侵权赔偿诉讼等,并提出了健全股东退出制度的立法建议。
[Abstract]:American famous company law expert Easterbrook and Fischel once said: "if limited liability is the most prominent characteristic of company law, shareholder voting right is the second significant characteristic of company law." This statement points out the important position of shareholder voting rights in the corporate legal system. The voting right of shareholders is a basic right of shareholders. Under the management system where the ownership of the company and the right of management are separated, the voting rights of the shareholders become the joint point between the ownership of the company and the control of the company, and it is an important way for the shareholders to realize their own interests. Although the voting rights of shareholders play an important role in the rights of shareholders, they are often ignored in the theoretical circle and in practice. In the expositions and works on the voting rights of shareholders, the content of voting rights of shareholders in joint-stock companies is the majority. There are few articles devoted to the voting rights of shareholders in limited companies. The company law revised in 2005 has partly revised the system of voting rights of shareholders, which has made great progress in the legislation of the system of voting rights of shareholders. However, there are many new situations in the practice of corporate governance, and new problems need to be solved through further improvement of the law. In this paper, the author analyzes and studies the voting rights system of the shareholders of limited companies in China from the aspects of theory and practice, points out the problems existing in the legislation and practice of our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the voting rights of shareholders. It has certain theoretical value and practical significance. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into three parts: The first part: unscramble the basic theory of shareholder voting right of limited company. Including the concept, nature and value of shareholders' voting rights in limited companies. It is pointed out that the nature of shareholders' voting rights in limited companies is a civil right, the right of firm ownership and the right of shareholders to participate in operation and management. The second part: discusses the exercise principle and method of shareholder's voting right of limited company. This part focuses on the dualistic principle of voting rights of shareholders in limited companies, that is, the principle of the proportion of capital contribution and the principle of "one person, one vote". This paper puts forward some legislative suggestions on how to use the articles of association to make exceptions to the voting rights of shareholders in a limited company and to exercise the voting rights of shareholders according to the proportion of paid-in contributions. The third part: narrate the legal consequence and remedy of shareholder's voting right of limited company. This part discusses the scope, results and effectiveness of shareholders' voting rights in limited companies, and analyzes the remedies that can be adopted when shareholders' voting rights are infringed in current judicial practice, including filing shareholders' resolutions to revoke litigation. Dissolution of the company litigation and tort compensation litigation, and put forward a sound system of shareholder withdrawal legislation.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 沙良永;浅论股东瑕疵决议的法律效力[J];绥化师专学报;2004年04期
2 何悦;李颖;;试论《公司法》第43条的“出资比例”[J];中国发展;2010年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 孙景新;论股东表决权[D];华东政法学院;2005年
2 施洪新;论我国有限责任公司股权转让限制[D];中国政法大学;2006年
3 周琳;论股东大会决议瑕疵的法律救济[D];东北财经大学;2005年
4 王素满;论股东表决权的限制[D];郑州大学;2006年
5 宋玉霞;股东表决权评析及我国立法完善[D];新疆财经大学;2007年
6 车发财;我国股东表决权制度之完善[D];山东大学;2012年
本文编号:1815084
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1815084.html