有限责任公司合约效力的司法干预及其界限

发布时间：2018-06-29 22:44

  本文选题：公司法 + 公司合约　； 参考：《法商研究》2011年02期

【摘要】：当下,就公司的内部治理而言,公司法固然具有重要意义,但比较而言,公司合约则更具有基础性作用。虽然公司内部治理应该贯穿自治原则,但在某些特定情况下,司法应该对公司合约的效力进行干预,以体现公司所固有的组织性特质和保护利害关系人的利益。具体而言,具有以下条件之一者,司法应干预公司合约的效力:(1)未参与合约缔结人或不同意缔约人的利益受损;(2)第三人利益受损;(3)公司合约违反公司本质特征。但是,司法对公司合约效力的干预也应有界限。这些界限主要包括:(1)公司合约的缔结和运行成本不能过高;(2)法官应该尊重公司内部的经营判断法则。因此,法官在否定公司合约的效力时应当慎重,以实现公司组织性与自治性之间的平衡。
[Abstract]:At present, as far as the internal governance of a company is concerned, the company law is of great significance, but comparatively speaking, the company contract plays a more fundamental role. Although corporate internal governance should run through the principle of autonomy, under certain circumstances, the judiciary should intervene in the effectiveness of the company contract to reflect the inherent organizational characteristics of the company and protect the interests of the stakeholders. Specifically, if there are any of the following conditions, the judicature shall interfere with the validity of the company contract: (1) the interests of the parties who are not party to the contract or who do not agree with the contract are impaired; (2) the interests of the third party are impaired; (3) the company contract violates the essential characteristics of the company. However, judicial intervention in the effectiveness of corporate contracts should also have boundaries. These limits include: (1) the conclusion and operation cost of the company contract should not be too high; (2) the judge should respect the judgment rule of the company's internal management. Therefore, the judge should be careful in denying the validity of the company contract in order to achieve the balance between organization and autonomy.
【作者单位】： 西北政法大学民商法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目(08CFX026)
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前1条

1 甘培忠;雷驰;;司法介入公司自治与公司法解释的政策尺度[J];河北学刊;2009年01期

【共引文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 喻胜云;;股份有限公司发起人出资不实民事责任剖析——关于《公司法》第84条、94条之系统解释[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年02期

2 罗培新;;填补公司合同“缝隙”——司法介入公司运作的一个分析框架[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期

3 吴志宇;;论异议股东股份回购请求权[J];北京工业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期

4 林q谛，

本文编号：2083668