我国公司股东出资法律制度完善之研究
[Abstract]:The company capital system is one of the cornerstones of the company system. In 2013, our company law comprehensively reformed the capital formation system in the company capital system, and transformed the original capital "law" into the capital "chapter". On the issue of shareholder contribution, shareholders are given full autonomy. This system reform is more thorough, which leads to a lot of questions about protecting the interests of creditors, which must be studied and solved. At the same time, after the implementation of the new company law, the original company law and judicial interpretation in restricting shareholders' contribution obligations appear blank, in the protection of the interests of the internal and external interests of the company is becoming more and more serious. Therefore, the author suggests that the legislation should return to the value orientation of "transaction safety" and encourage shareholders to voluntarily verify capital and bring the result of capital verification into the scope of enterprise credit information publicity. At the same time, the shareholder investment guarantee system is introduced to protect the interests of the company's traders, especially the creditors. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces the content and influence of company law reform in China. Firstly, it introduces the content of the company law reform; secondly, it analyzes the positive and negative effects on the company, the shareholders and the creditors after the company law reform. This paper summarizes the relevant problems in the legal system of shareholder's contribution after the reform of company law. In the second part, the author analyzes in detail the relevant problems in the legal system of shareholder's contribution under the new Company Law, and the adverse effects of the related problems on the creditors of the company. This chapter first analyzes whether the nature of the company capital system has changed after the company law reform in China, and at the same time proves that the essence of the company law amendment is that the legislative thinking is changing from protecting transaction security to encouraging public investment. Secondly, it analyzes whether the nature of shareholder's obligation to contribute under the new company law has changed, and points out that there is an obvious imbalance in protecting the interests of internal and external persons of the company. Finally, from this company law reform to abolish the minimum capital, the system of shareholders' contribution, the role of actual contribution and the cancellation of the system of capital verification. This paper analyzes the influence of the shareholders' contribution system on the interests of the creditors one by one. The third part, puts forward the idea of perfecting and protecting the interests of creditors under the new company law. In view of the gap between the reform of the shareholder's contribution system and other existing systems of the Company Law, which leads to the imbalance in the protection of the interests of the internal and external persons of the company, the interests of the creditors of the company need to be protected and perfected urgently. First of all, in the company law legislation, we should return to the "transaction safety" as the standard. Secondly, the shareholders should be encouraged to verify their capital voluntarily, and the verification certificate should be incorporated into the enterprise credit information system to protect the interests of the company's outsiders, especially the creditors of the company. Finally, it is suggested that the shareholder contribution guarantee system should be introduced to replace the shareholder supplementary liability system in the existing company system, and the meaning, nature and content of the shareholder contribution guarantee system should be introduced in detail.
【学位授予单位】:上海社会科学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 金宝林,高翔;关于公司股东出资方式的思考[J];工商行政管理;2000年07期
2 姜亚兰;已经抵押的财产不得作为股东出资[J];光彩;2003年09期
3 姜亚兰 ,江南;已抵押的财产不得作为股东出资[J];中国防伪;2003年09期
4 姜亚兰;江南;;抵押财产不得作股东出资[J];现代营销;2003年10期
5 邓海桑;;公司股东出资义务合理性的基础分析[J];中南大学学报(社会科学版);2003年05期
6 王浩;;论有限责任公司股东出资的法律意义及其性质[J];法制与社会;2008年08期
7 吴依霖;;股东出资制度探析[J];法制与社会;2009年11期
8 管晓峰;;有限公司股东出资争议救济分析[J];政法学刊;2010年03期
9 叶映辉;;论有限责任公司股东出资转让[J];法制与社会;2012年10期
10 段勇;股东出资若干法律制度研究[J];政治与法律;1998年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 邓海桑;;公司股东出资义务合理性的基础分析[A];中国商法年刊第三卷(2003)[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 余瀛波;北京四千余家公司申报股东出资情况[N];法制日报;2014年
2 记者 李冰峰;股东出资怎样变死钱为活钱?[N];金华日报;2014年
3 邱隆芬;追究有限责任公司股东出资责任的主体[N];人民法院报;2003年
4 ;股东出资不足该承担什么责任?[N];信息时报;2003年
5 记者 袁定波;尚未终审股东出资纠纷案适用决定[N];法制日报;2014年
6 王洪亮;公司股东出资不足责任分析[N];江苏法制报;2011年
7 上海市第一中级人民法院 何建;部分款项交于公司而未经验资的股东出资义务履行的认定[N];人民法院报;2011年
8 井陉矿区人民法院 张领军 李建忠;股东出资不实 承担连带责任[N];河北科技报;2006年
9 本报记者 宋斌斌;股东出资将拒绝“空头支票”[N];中国工业报;2006年
10 江苏省南京市玄武区人民法院、无锡市南长区人民法院 赵虎邋陈志超;股东出资不足致公司不具法人资格时的责任分担[N];人民法院报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 薄燕娜;股东出资形式法律制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨海东;认缴资本制下股东出资责任研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
2 林省;新《公司法》中的股东出资义务研究[D];兰州大学;2015年
3 叶傲雪;股东出资义务的理性解读[D];华东政法大学;2015年
4 隋思远;公司注册资本认缴制下法律问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
5 罗金鹏;股东出资法律问题及对策研究[D];云南大学;2015年
6 杨元东;新公司资本制度下股东出资责任问题研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
7 王舒文;注册资本认缴制下股东出资义务问题研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
8 李金昌;完全认缴资本制下股东出资责任制度的困境与重构[D];华东政法大学;2016年
9 吉阳;认缴制下股东出资责任研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年
10 阮光鑫;我国公司股东出资法律制度完善之研究[D];上海社会科学院;2016年
,本文编号:2211269
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2211269.html