论中小股东在公司章程中的法律地位
发布时间：2018-11-21 08:49
【摘要】：中小股东是和控股股东相对的股东群体,在当今中小股东劣势处境日益受关注的社会背景下,讨论中小股东在公司章程中的法律地位有重要的现实意义。《公司法》不是一部保护弱者的法律,利用公司章程来恢复中小股东和控股股东的利益平衡有积极意义。 公司章程是重要的公司文件,公司章程的自由属性为中小股东的利益保护提供了一个合法平台。中小股东和控股股东在公司章程中具有平等的法律地位,但股东法律地位平等并不等于股东权利义务绝对相等,公司章程在一定的界限内适当对中小股东作有利的倾斜不违反股东平等原则,也符合我国的立法精神、而且是必要的、可行的。 中小股东可以利用《公司法》中的但书条款,在公司章程中对《公司法》三种不同性质的法律规范作有利的实践:对强制性条款作出有利自己的具体化、明晰化、严格化的解释;对补充性条款排除适用而公司章程中作出自己有利的规定;对赋权性条款更加自由的规定对自己有利的权利义务。
[Abstract]:The minority shareholders are the shareholders relative to the controlling shareholders. In the social background where the minority shareholders' disadvantage situation is paid more and more attention to, It is of great practical significance to discuss the legal status of minority shareholders in the articles of association. Company Law is not a law to protect the weak, and it is of positive significance to use the articles of Association to restore the balance of interests between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders. The articles of association are important documents of the company, and the free property of the articles of association provides a legal platform for the protection of the interests of minority shareholders. Minority shareholders and controlling shareholders have equal legal status in the articles of association of the company, but the equal legal status of shareholders does not mean that the rights and obligations of shareholders are absolutely equal. It is necessary and feasible that the articles of association should be favorable to minority shareholders within certain limits and not violate the principle of equality of shareholders and accord with the spirit of legislation in our country. The minority shareholders can make use of the proviso clause in the Company Law to make favorable practice to the three kinds of legal norms of the Company Law in the articles of Association of the Company Law: to make the mandatory clause specific and clear. Strict interpretation; To exclude the application of supplementary clauses and to make its own favorable provisions in the articles of association; to provide for more liberal provisions of empowerment clauses in the interests of one's own rights and obligations.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2346475
[Abstract]:The minority shareholders are the shareholders relative to the controlling shareholders. In the social background where the minority shareholders' disadvantage situation is paid more and more attention to, It is of great practical significance to discuss the legal status of minority shareholders in the articles of association. Company Law is not a law to protect the weak, and it is of positive significance to use the articles of Association to restore the balance of interests between minority shareholders and controlling shareholders. The articles of association are important documents of the company, and the free property of the articles of association provides a legal platform for the protection of the interests of minority shareholders. Minority shareholders and controlling shareholders have equal legal status in the articles of association of the company, but the equal legal status of shareholders does not mean that the rights and obligations of shareholders are absolutely equal. It is necessary and feasible that the articles of association should be favorable to minority shareholders within certain limits and not violate the principle of equality of shareholders and accord with the spirit of legislation in our country. The minority shareholders can make use of the proviso clause in the Company Law to make favorable practice to the three kinds of legal norms of the Company Law in the articles of Association of the Company Law: to make the mandatory clause specific and clear. Strict interpretation; To exclude the application of supplementary clauses and to make its own favorable provisions in the articles of association; to provide for more liberal provisions of empowerment clauses in the interests of one's own rights and obligations.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 黄建文;;公司章程解释方法的若干思考[J];求索;2009年12期
2 董朝阳;;新公司法下的公司章程自治[J];现代企业;2009年02期
3 郭奕;;论公司章程自治的界限[J];浙江社会科学;2008年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 孙淑懿;论我国股份有限公司股东账簿查阅权[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 朱晶晶;论中小股东权益保护边界之合理界定[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 陆曙光;公司章程制度若干法律问题研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
，本文编号：2346475
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2346475.html
