上市公司中小股东权益保护之股东派生诉讼问题研究
[Abstract]:As a kind of joint-stock company with the highest degree of marketization, it is not only an important part of company law, but also a complicated organization form in practical operation. Compared with the limited liability company, the scale of the listed company is generally larger. Compared with the ordinary stock company, the listed company is a part of the company with good performance. The socialization and expansion of the shareholders of the company make the interests more extensive. At the same time, it also requires it to bear more responsibilities, not only to the original shareholders of the company, but also to the number of small and medium shareholders. The related financial statements, performance statements, major decisions and company planning are not only related to the interests of large shareholders, but also to the interests of minority shareholders. However, due to the existence of capital majority decision, minority shareholders' right to speak can only be released, or even deprived. Major shareholders or their joint manipulation of the company damage the rights and interests of minority shareholders from time to time. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the power contrast between the large shareholders and the minority shareholders through the way of law, and to discuss the proper protection of the rights and interests of the minority shareholders through the way of judicial intervention. This paper attempts to break through the simple discussion of protecting minority shareholders, which may damage the overall interests of the company and ultimately damage the crux of the rights and interests of minority shareholders, hoping to protect the legitimate rights and interests of both sides, large shareholders or their joint control of the operation of the company. To seek an acceptable balance between the pursuit of economic interests and the protection of the interests of the minority shareholders, thus achieving the purpose of protecting the rights and interests of the minority shareholders. In this paper, only shareholders derivative litigation as a research entry point.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 傅穹;曹理;;股东派生诉讼提起权滥用防止研究——兼评2005年《公司法》的相关规定[J];当代法学;2006年02期
2 胡晓静;;德国股东派生诉讼制度评析[J];当代法学;2007年02期
3 朱圆;;美国的股东派生诉讼制度[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2008年11期
4 朱榄叶;“碧纯”水侵权案探讨[J];法学;1997年12期
5 邓敏贞;;论股东派生诉讼制度[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年11期
6 吴一平;;股东派生诉讼之比较[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2007年05期
7 张璜;;对欧洲大陆法系国家股东代表诉讼的比较与借鉴[J];传承;2009年14期
8 彭礼明;;论我国的股东派生诉讼制度——兼评我国2005年修订的《公司法》第一百五十二条[J];湖北财经高等专科学校学报;2008年01期
9 殷鑫;;论股东派生诉讼的诉讼费用承担[J];经济研究导刊;2009年09期
10 周剑龙;;日本公司法制现代化中的股东代表诉讼制度[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2006年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 赵旭东;[N];法制日报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 许明白;论美国派生诉讼程序[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
2 管其义;中日股东代表诉讼制度比较研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年
3 董桂武;股东派生诉讼研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
4 李守众;论股东代表诉讼制度[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2387215
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2387215.html