南海仲裁案临时仲裁庭之公正性剖析

发布时间：2018-03-12 21:06

本文选题：南海仲裁案　切入点：临时仲裁庭　出处：《东南亚研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：国际仲裁只有具备充分的公正性,才会具有执行的权威性。受理菲律宾政府单方提起南海仲裁案的临时仲裁庭,从其性质和它与权威国际司法、国际仲裁机构的联系可见,它并不是具有广泛认可的公正性和权威性的国际仲裁机构,与联合国没有关系。仲裁庭的成立利用了《联合国海洋法公约》争端解决机制及附件七仲裁制度设计的缺陷,其活动利用了与某些国际司法相关机构的模糊关系;仲裁庭违反国际司法、国际仲裁机构组建的普遍原则,运行程序缺乏法定性;柳井俊二法官未回避仲裁庭的组建工作,不符合法官中立性原则的要求;仲裁员在案件审理过程中随意更改自己的立场,缺乏独立性;仲裁庭作出的所谓"裁决",在法理适用与事实认定方面存在明显谬误。临时仲裁庭的公正性严重缺乏,其活动和最终"裁决"结果也是非法无效的。
[Abstract]:Only if international arbitration has full impartiality can it have the authority of enforcement. The ad hoc arbitral tribunal that accepts the arbitration case brought unilaterally by the Philippine Government in the South China Sea can be seen from its nature and its links with authoritative international justice and international arbitration institutions. It is not an internationally recognized body of impartiality and authority and has no bearing on the United Nations... the establishment of the arbitral tribunal takes advantage of the deficiencies in the design of the dispute settlement mechanism of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and of the arbitration system in Annex VII, Its activities took advantage of the vague relationship with certain international judicial bodies; the arbitral tribunal violated the universal principles of international justice and the establishment of international arbitration bodies, and the procedures for its operation were not legally qualified; and Judge Yanai Shunji did not challenge the formation of the arbitral tribunal, It does not meet the requirements of the principle of neutrality of the judge, the arbitrators change their position at will in the course of the case hearing, and they lack independence; The so-called "award" made by the arbitral tribunal is manifestly false in the application of the law and in the determination of the facts. The impartiality of the interim tribunal is seriously lacking, and its activities and the final "award" result are also illegal and invalid.
【作者单位】：郑州大学马克思主义学院越南研究所;郑州大学国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心;郑州大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】