国际贸易中的知识产权滥用问题法律研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 22:14

本文选题：TRIPS协议　切入点：知识产权滥用　出处：《辽宁大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：现代经济的发展形势要求每个国家都参与其中,正因为如此,知识产权在世界范围内的交流频率加快。知识产权贸易已经和货物贸易,服务贸易成为WTO体系内的国际贸易的三大支柱。知识产权逐渐成为国家间、企业间争夺的目标。在国际贸易中,与知识产权有关的国际纠纷也逐渐增多,突出表现为知识产权滥用的问题。本文首先在通过分析国际公约的规定以及国内学者的研究成果基础上,对这—问题进行界定。在国际公约当中并没有明确的阐述知识产权滥用的内涵,各国政府可以根据国内实情进行具体的规定。接着在国际贸易的背景下,从实体法与程序法的角度列举出几种主要的知识产权滥用行为。现实生活中,这些行为不会按照书本上的定义发生,因此在进行贸易交流时,要根据合同内容进行具体的区分。本文也不——列举,只是阐述几种主要行为。在此基础上,接下来分别从国际法和典型国内立法的角度对这个问题进行规制。在与国际贸易紧密相关的TRIPS协议中,虽然没有具体说明对此问题规制的方法,但是它提供了最低要求,即各国可以在国内法中结合具体国情制定不违反公约的具体规定。以美国和欧盟为代表的发达国家和地区将规制此问题与反垄断法进行衔接,而以巴西和印度为代表的发展中国家更多的是适应国际公约的条款,用知识产权相关法来进行规制。最后阐述中国对这个问题的法律规定。虽然经历了忽视规制,注重保护的阶段,但《反垄断法》的出台,开始提出规制这个问题了。即使规定的不深入不详细,但已经做出进步。《专利法》等相关知识产权法的修改也是为了更好地适应国际公约的规定。作者在此基础上,借鉴美国、巴西等国家的经验,提出进一步的完善建议。本文在分析国际公约规定的基础上,在国际贸易的背景下,用结合案例的形式阐述界定知识产权滥用行为及其几种主要的表现形式。并且在通过对比分析技术水平、经济实力不同的国家对此问题规制的不同的前提下,结合中国现有的相关法律法规的具体规定,旨在对中国规制这一问题提出参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:The development of the modern economy requires every country to participate in it. Because of this, the frequency of intellectual property rights (IPR) exchanges in the world has accelerated. Intellectual property trade has been trading with goods. Trade in services has become the three pillars of international trade in the WTO system. Intellectual property rights have gradually become the target of competition among countries and enterprises. In international trade, the number of international disputes related to intellectual property rights has also gradually increased. The problem of intellectual property abuse is prominent. First of all, this paper defines this problem on the basis of analyzing the provisions of international conventions and the research results of domestic scholars. There is no clear explanation of the connotation of intellectual property abuse in international conventions. In the context of international trade, governments can then list several major forms of intellectual property abuse from the perspective of substantive and procedural law... in real life, These acts do not occur as defined in the book, so trade exchanges should be based on specific distinctions based on the content of the contract. Then the problem is regulated from the angle of international law and typical domestic legislation. In the TRIPS agreement, which is closely related to international trade, although it does not specify the method of regulating this issue, it provides the minimum requirements. That is, countries can make specific provisions that do not violate the Convention in the light of the specific national conditions in their domestic laws. Developed countries and regions represented by the United States and the European Union will link up this issue with the anti-monopoly law. While the developing countries, represented by Brazil and India, are more likely to adapt to the provisions of international conventions and regulate them with IPR related laws. Finally, the legal provisions of China on this issue have been elaborated. Although it has experienced neglect of regulation, Attention is paid to the stage of protection, but with the introduction of the Anti-monopoly Law, the issue of regulation has begun to be raised. However, progress has been made. The revision of relevant intellectual property laws such as Patent Law is also aimed at better adapting to the provisions of international conventions. On this basis, the author draws lessons from the experiences of the United States, Brazil and other countries and puts forward suggestions for further improvement. Based on the analysis of the provisions of international conventions and under the background of international trade, this paper expounds the definition of abuse of intellectual property rights and its main manifestations in the form of case studies. On the premise of different regulation on this issue in different countries with different economic strength, combined with the specific provisions of relevant laws and regulations in China, the purpose of this paper is to provide a reference and reference for China to regulate this issue.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1;D997.1

【参考文献】