非洲示范投资法述评

发布时间：2018-07-12 21:51

本文选题：非洲 + 示范投资法　；参考：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：2003年世界投资报告显示,在广大非洲国家内部,有一些国家对外商投资者具有比较大的吸引力,如安哥拉、阿尔及利亚、尼日利亚、乍得和突尼斯等国家。然而,从世界投资报告中,我们可以清楚地发现,这些非洲国家仅仅只是极少数,他们的成功不能改变整个非洲大陆在吸引外商直接投资领域的劣势地位。根据2003年世界投资报告显示,与发达国家和其他发展中国家相比,在20世纪50年代以后的几十年中,广大非洲国家对外商投资者的吸引力大大减小。以某些亚洲国家为例,20世纪50年代到70年代几十年间,亚洲、非洲和太平洋地区对外商投资者具有同等吸引力。然而,从1980年到2003年,亚洲和太平洋地区对外商投资者的吸引力远远超过了非洲国家。甚至,如中国、中国香港、新加坡和马来西亚这些国家和地区,在不同的时间,一个国家或地区比整个非洲大陆吸引的对外直接投资的数量还要多。进入20世纪90年代,非洲国家在吸引外商直接投资领域仍然只占很少的比例。2003年,以改善撒哈拉以南非洲国家的投资法律环境为目标,促进非洲投资法律一体化,法律专家们经过不断努力,通过了一部非洲示范投资法。在非洲历史上,由于种种原因,非洲以往的投资法都失败了,非洲示范投资法在借鉴以往投资法遭遇失败教训的基础上,突破以往的思维模式,制定了一般性的示范投资法,该法适用于所有对非进行投资的外商直接投资者和非洲国内的私人投资者。对非洲示范投资法的重要条款进行评析是本文的研究重点,主要包括对非投资企业自主权的保障;非洲国家对外资实施国有化的保护;对非投资争议的解决和对非投资活动的管制等内容。其中,对非投资争议的解决部分主要研究替代性纠纷解决机制,是示范投资法具有创新意义的重要条款。有关对非投资活动的管制部分,是非洲示范投资法最具有创新意义和最大胆的规定,这一规定坚决反对非洲国家的投资腐败,并且不考虑任何商业目的,具有研究价值。研究非洲示范投资法的具体条款,是了解和进一步完善非洲示范投资法的基础,也有助于修改和完善我国外资立法。
[Abstract]:The 2003 World Investment report shows that some African countries are attractive to foreign investors, such as Angola, Algeria, Nigeria, Chad and Tunisia. However, from the World Investment report, we can clearly see that these African countries are only a very small number of countries and their success cannot change the inferior position of the whole African continent in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI). According to the World Investment report 2003, compared with the developed countries and other developing countries, in the decades after the 1950s, the attraction of the vast number of African countries to foreign investors has been greatly reduced. In some Asian countries, for example, in the 1950s and 1970s, Asia, Africa and the Pacific were equally attractive to foreign investors. From 1980 to 2003, however, Asia and the Pacific were far more attractive to foreign investors than African countries. Even in countries such as China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, at different times, one country or region attracts more foreign direct investment than the entire African continent. In the 1990s, African countries still accounted for only a small proportion in attracting foreign direct investment. In 2003, the goal was to improve the legal environment for investment in sub-Saharan Africa and to promote the integration of investment laws in Africa. Through constant efforts, legal experts adopted an African model investment law. In the history of Africa, due to various reasons, previous investment laws in Africa have all failed. On the basis of drawing lessons from the failure of previous investment laws, the African Model Investment Law has broken through the previous thinking pattern and formulated a general model investment law. The Act applies to all foreign direct investors in Africa and private investors in Africa. The evaluation of the important provisions of the African Model Investment Law is the focus of this paper, including the guarantee of the autonomy of non-investment enterprises, the protection of the nationalization of foreign investment in African countries, and the protection of foreign investment in Africa. The settlement of non-investment disputes and the regulation of non-investment activities. Among them, the non-investment dispute resolution part mainly studies the alternative dispute resolution mechanism, is the model investment law has the innovation significance important clause. The regulation of non-investment activities is the most innovative and bold provision of the African Model Investment Law, which is firmly opposed to investment corruption in African countries and has research value without considering any commercial purpose. The study of the specific terms of the African Model Investment Law is the basis of understanding and further improving the African Model Investment Law, and is also helpful to the revision and improvement of China's foreign investment legislation.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4

【参考文献】