国际组织表决机制研究
发布时间：2018-07-15 19:07
【摘要】：国际组织的表决机制,单单就一个组织的表决机制进行研究的作品很多,但对于其形成是否具有普遍规律,讨论则相对较少,本文试图探寻究竟是哪些因素影响着表决机制的设计。 绪论部分介绍选题意义、研究现状、研究思路等。第一章则将表决权分配、决策规则这两个因素,作为分类标准,对各项表决机制及其各自的优点与缺陷进行梳理。第二章的五节,则分别考察议程性质、成员规模、权力格局、民主密度、路径依赖这五个因素,对表决权分配和决策规则存在哪些影响；为什么选择这五个,每一节最前面的部分,将分别予以说明；在考察中,文章先后提出并论证了六个假定；第二章第六节,则以表格形式,对影响因素与表决机制的关系进行总结,以期能系统性地揭示表决机制的生成机理。第三章则选取欧盟理事会作为案例,来检验前文假设。 本文认为,表决权分配,基本只受议程性质影响；但在低级政治领域,创始会员国权力格局的不同,也会对表决权分配产生影响。至于决策规则,议程性质主要为高级政治、成员规模越小、权力格局趋向于两极、民主密度越低,则决策规则越趋向于全体一致；而这些因素若走向反面,则决策规则也相应地向相反方向变动。
[Abstract]:The voting mechanism of international organizations has a lot of work on the voting mechanism of an organization, but whether it has a universal law or not, the discussion is relatively small. This article tries to find out what factors affect the design of voting mechanism.
The introduction part introduces the significance of the topic, the research status, the research ideas and so on. In the first chapter, the two factors, the voting rights distribution and the decision rules, are used as the classification criteria. The voting mechanism and their respective advantages and defects are combed. The five section of the second chapter examines the nature of the agenda, the scale of the members, the power pattern, democratic density, and the path dependence. What are the effects of these five factors on the distribution of voting rights and the rules of decision making; why these five, the most front parts of each section will be explained separately; in the investigation, the article successively puts forward and demonstrates six hypotheses; the second chapter and sixth section, in the form of tabular form, summarizes the relationship between the influence factors and the voting mechanism. In order to systematically reveal the generating mechanism of voting mechanism, the third chapter selects the Council of the European Union as a case to test the foregoing hypothesis.
This article holds that the distribution of voting rights is mainly influenced by the nature of the agenda, but in the low political field, the difference in the power grid of the founding members' state power will also have an impact on the distribution of the right to vote. As for the rules of decision, the agenda is mainly senior politics, the smaller the membership is, the more the power pattern tends to the two poles, the lower the Democratic density, the more the decision rules are. Tends to be unanimous; and if these factors go to the opposite side, the rules of decision are correspondingly reversed.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D993.9
[Abstract]:The voting mechanism of international organizations has a lot of work on the voting mechanism of an organization, but whether it has a universal law or not, the discussion is relatively small. This article tries to find out what factors affect the design of voting mechanism.
The introduction part introduces the significance of the topic, the research status, the research ideas and so on. In the first chapter, the two factors, the voting rights distribution and the decision rules, are used as the classification criteria. The voting mechanism and their respective advantages and defects are combed. The five section of the second chapter examines the nature of the agenda, the scale of the members, the power pattern, democratic density, and the path dependence. What are the effects of these five factors on the distribution of voting rights and the rules of decision making; why these five, the most front parts of each section will be explained separately; in the investigation, the article successively puts forward and demonstrates six hypotheses; the second chapter and sixth section, in the form of tabular form, summarizes the relationship between the influence factors and the voting mechanism. In order to systematically reveal the generating mechanism of voting mechanism, the third chapter selects the Council of the European Union as a case to test the foregoing hypothesis.
This article holds that the distribution of voting rights is mainly influenced by the nature of the agenda, but in the low political field, the difference in the power grid of the founding members' state power will also have an impact on the distribution of the right to vote. As for the rules of decision, the agenda is mainly senior politics, the smaller the membership is, the more the power pattern tends to the two poles, the lower the Democratic density, the more the decision rules are. Tends to be unanimous; and if these factors go to the opposite side, the rules of decision are correspondingly reversed.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D993.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 余锋;;WTO表决制度论：民主的视角[J];厦门大学法律评论;2007年02期
2 沈启帆;徐向华;;论立法多数决制——一个公共选择理论的视角[J];法学;2005年12期
3 章秀华;;论WTO争端解决机制的性质[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
4 王哲;;论WTO争端解决机制中的“反向协商一致”原则[J];法制与社会;2008年02期
5 黄梅波;赵国君;;IMF表决制度:发展中国家的地位及其改革策略[J];广东社会科学;2006年06期
6 杨鹰;;《里斯本条约》的制度创新与欧盟领导力的提升[J];国际关系学院学报;2011年02期
7 阎学通;;荀子的国际政治思想及启示[J];国际政治科学;2007年01期
8 谈毅;金sパ，
本文编号：2125094
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2125094.html
