运用军事措施解决海洋争端的法律问题

发布时间：2018-09-17 12:37

【摘要】："禁止使用武力或者以武力相威胁"与"和平解决国际争端"是现代国际法的两项基本原则,然而,不应由此推导出"国际法绝对禁止使用武力"的一般性结论。实践中,该两项原则与主权国家的基本权利之一——自保权之间并不存在冲突,在具备了一系列限定性要件(例如自卫)的前提下,国家有权诉诸武力解决争端。在国际海洋争端最终无法通过政治外交途径或者国际司法办法解决的极端情况下,无法排除采取军事措施解决争端的可能性。当然,在采取军事措施时应遵守武装冲突法的原则与规则,将使用武力引起的消极影响降到最低限度,以期在政治伦理层面掌握主动权,并最终在政治上和军事上均取得优势地位,达成采取军事措施保障国家利益的目的。
[Abstract]:"Prohibition of the use or threat of use of force" and "peaceful settlement of international disputes" are two basic principles of modern international law. However, a general conclusion of "absolute prohibition of the use of force in international law" should not be deduced therefrom. In practice, there is no conflict between these two principles and the right to self-protection, one of the basic rights of sovereign states. On the premise of having a series of restrictive elements (such as self-defence), the state has the right to resort to force to settle disputes. In the extreme situation that international maritime disputes can not be resolved through political and diplomatic means or international judicial methods, it is impossible to rule out the possibility of adopting military measures to settle disputes. Of course, military measures should be taken in accordance with the principles and rules of the law of armed conflict and with a view to minimizing the negative effects of the use of force with a view to taking the initiative at the political and ethical level, And finally in the political and military advantages to achieve the goal of military measures to protect national interests.
【作者单位】：浙江理工大学法政学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目《全球化背景下中国海洋权益法律保障研究》(09JZD0023)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【参考文献】