当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

关联交易合同法律效力问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-09 19:54

  本文选题:关联交易合同 切入点:效力要件 出处:《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:关联交易及其合同本质上属于中性概念,公平的关联交易对商业活动的效率理念有促进作用,,因而应予提倡。但不公平的关联交易则会由于关联关系人对公司一方当事人意志上的控制,易对公司整体利益、公司中小股东及债权人的利益造成损害。本文着重对关联交易合同的效力要件、效力状态及其法律规制问题进行了探讨,以寻求更好的规制关联交易合同的途径。 文章的第一部分对本文的研究对象进行了界定。通过对关联交易相关概念的分析,将要研究的关联交易合同所涉及的关联交易类型锁定为基本自我交易。之后探讨关联交易合同在成立要件上的特殊性,以及对民商法传统理论构成的挑战。 文章第二部分阐述了关联交易合同效力判定的相关问题。本部分对关联交易合同的效力要件以及不公平关联交易合同的效力状态进行研究。关联交易合同的效力要件问题我国法律中基本没有作何规定,笔者主要从合同的一般效力要件以及国外立法例的研究中总结关联交易合同效力要件的构成及各要件的具体内容。随后通过对合同多种效力状态的分析阐释关联交易合同可撤销性的合理性,并讨论了可撤销性在合同法上的理论基础。 文章第三部分揭示了我国合同法、公司法在关联交易合同效力规则规范方面的不足。我国合同法中没有将关联交易合同纳入调整范围,公司法中对关联交易合同效力规则也没有具体的规定,致使关联交易合同在我国法律中适用无门,关联交易合同利益相关人的权益难以得到保障。 文章第四部分内容针对上文探讨的我国法律在关联交易合同效力规则上的立法现状提出了自己的完善意见。笔者认为关联交易合同的效力问题属于合同法与公司法交叉领域的问题,对这一问题的重构与完善需从合同法和公司法的角度全面入手。因而本文就合同法中关联交易合同撤销规则的设立提出了建议,同时在公司法的披露制度、表决权排除制度等方面的完善也表达了个人意见。
[Abstract]:The related party transaction and its contract belong to the neutral concept essentially, the fair related party transaction has the promotion function to the commercial activity efficiency idea, Therefore, it should be advocated. However, unfair related party transactions will easily benefit the company as a whole because of the control of the party concerned in the company. The interests of the minority shareholders and creditors of the company are damaged. This paper focuses on the effective elements, the effective state and the legal regulation of the related party transaction contract, in order to seek a better way to regulate the related party transaction contract. The first part of the article defines the research object of this paper. The related party transaction type that will be studied in the related party transaction contract is locked in the basic self-transaction. Then the particularity of the related party transaction contract in the essential elements and the challenge to the traditional theory of civil and commercial law are discussed. In the second part of the article, the author expounds the related problems of the validity judgment of the related party transaction contract. This part studies the effective elements of the related party transaction contract and the validity state of the unfair related party transaction contract. The effect of the related party transaction contract. There is basically no provision in the law of our country on the requirements of force. The author summarizes the constitution and the concrete content of the related party transaction contract from the general effective elements of contract and the research of foreign legislation cases. Then, through the analysis of various effective states of the contract, the author explains the relevance. The reasonableness of the revocability of the transaction contract, The theoretical basis of revocability in contract law is also discussed. The third part of the article reveals the deficiency of the contract law of our country, the company law in the regulation of the validity rules of the related party transaction contract, which does not bring the related party transaction contract into the adjustment scope in the contract law of our country. There is no specific regulation on the validity rules of the related party transaction contract in the company law, which leads to the application of the related party transaction contract in the law of our country without a door, and the rights and interests of the related party in the related party transaction contract are difficult to be protected. In the 4th part of the article, the author puts forward his own opinions on the legislative status quo of the validity rules of the related party transaction contracts discussed above. The author thinks that the validity of the related party transaction contracts belongs to the contract law and the public. Issues in the cross-cutting area of justice, The reconstruction and perfection of this problem should be carried out from the angle of contract law and company law. Therefore, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the establishment of contract revocation rules in contract law, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions in the disclosure system of company law. The perfection of the system of exclusion of voting rights also expresses personal opinions.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 董安生;陈洁;;不公平关联交易合同的可撤销性问题研究[J];法学杂志;2009年02期

2 董安生;张保华;;缺失的合同效力规则——论关联交易对传统民法的挑战[J];法学家;2007年03期

3 施天涛;杜晶;;我国公司法上关联交易的皈依及其法律规制——一个利益冲突交易法则的中国版本[J];中国法学;2007年06期



本文编号:1590020

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1590020.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户679d5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com