违反强制性规定合同效力问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-10 03:39

本文选题：强制性规定　切入点：效力性强制性规定　出处：《首都经济贸易大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：关于违法合同效力问题，我国在法律的制定方面，从1981年《经济合同法》至今，经历了漫长的历史实践变革。在一段特殊历史时期的背景下，1986年《民法通则》第58条第5项对《经济合同法》进行了突破性的变革，并未明确规定《经济合同法》中关于违反政策性合同无效问题，虽然变革并不彻底，但该条法律规定依然将“违反法律或社会公共利益的民事行为等同于无效”的理论深入人心，由于规定过于笼统，无效民事行为范围被无限扩大。为了应对当前实践中出现的此类违法效力认定问题，，我国《合同法司法解释（二）》首次做出了效力性强制性规定与管理性强制性规定之分，然而在立法层面上，并未指出二者的区分标准，这一点也体现了我国现行合同法在规范配置上存在一定的缺陷，无论是《合同法》还是相关司法解释，仍未能从根本上解决违反强制性规定合同效力认定问题，关于效力性强制性规定认定标准问题仍然需要予以进一步阐释。在立法过程中，有必要考虑社会经济的转型，也正是在这样的价值取向下，对于我国现行立法的反思才会更加有意义。由于过去长期以来，我国社会发展的客观背景以及社会所处时代的特殊性，强制性规定造成合同无效的情形被肆意扩大，要想改变这样的现状，必须在新的价值取向基础上特别是要建立合同效力认定体系，实际上，本文也正是结合我国当前立法状况，在中国现有法治水平的大背景中展开讨论的。
[Abstract]:With regard to the validity of illegal contracts, our country has been making laws from 1981 to the present. Under the background of a special historical period, in 1986, item 5 of Article 58 of the General principles of Civil Law made a breakthrough in the Economic contract Law. There is no explicit provision in the Economic contract Law on invalidity of a violation of a policy contract, although the changes are not complete. However, the theory that "civil acts contrary to the law or the public interest of the society are equal to invalidity" is still deeply rooted in the people's mind, because the provisions are too general. The scope of invalid civil acts has been expanded infinitely. In order to deal with the problem of illegal validity in current practice, the judicial interpretation of contract Law (2) in China has for the first time made the distinction between mandatory provisions of validity and mandatory provisions of management. However, on the legislative level, it does not point out the distinguishing standard of the two, which also reflects the defects in the standard allocation of the current contract law in our country, whether it is the contract Law or the related judicial interpretation. It is still unable to solve the problem of the validity of the contract in violation of the mandatory provisions fundamentally, and the criterion of the determination of the validity of the mandatory provisions still needs to be further explained. In the legislative process, it is necessary to consider the social and economic transformation, and it is under such a value orientation that the reflection on the current legislation of our country will be more meaningful. The objective background of our country's social development and the particularity of the times in which the society is living, the situation in which the compulsory provisions result in the invalidation of contracts has been wantonly expanded. If we want to change this status quo, On the basis of the new value orientation, especially the establishment of the contract validity determination system, in fact, this article is also discussed in the background of China's existing level of rule of law in the light of the current legislative situation of our country.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】