违反信息义务致损的民事救济——从德国法与英美法之比较展开讨论

发布时间：2018-04-20 10:38

本文选题：信息义务 + 缔约上过失　；参考：《法商研究》2007年06期

【摘要】：违反信息义务可以导致行为人承担民事责任的后果。德国法主要依赖扩张合同法的适用范围来解决这一问题。这种途径虽然在司法实践中取得了一定成效,但也具有一定的局限性。而英美法主要依据侵权法来救济违反信息义务中的受害人。《中华人民共和国合同法》仿效德国法规定了缔约上过失制度,结合其他制度以及《中华人民共和国公司法》、《中华人民共和国证券法》等法律、法规,基本上解决了合同中违反信息义务造成损失的救济问题。但我国现行法对没有交易关系的第三人违反信息义务该如何处理,没有作明确的规定。在未来立法中是否规定不实表示这一具体侵权行为类型,取决于未来民法典中合同法部分是否保留缔约上过失制度。
[Abstract]:Breach of information obligation may lead to the consequences of civil liability of the perpetrator. German law mainly depends on expanding the scope of application of contract law to solve this problem. Although this approach has made some achievements in judicial practice, it also has some limitations. However, the Anglo-American law is mainly based on the tort law to remedy the victims of breach of information obligations. The contract Law of the people's Republic of China emulated the German law and stipulated the system of fault in the treaty. In combination with other systems and laws and regulations such as the Company Law of the people's Republic of China and the Securities Law of the people's Republic of China, the problem of relief for losses caused by breach of information obligations in contracts is basically solved. However, there is no clear regulation on how to deal with the breach of information obligation by the third party without transaction relationship in the current law of our country. Whether or not this specific type of tort is stipulated in the future legislation depends on whether the contract law part of the future civil code retains the system of fault in contracting.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】