当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

专利许可合同法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-20 20:17

  本文选题:专利许可合同 + 专利无效 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:以专利创新为代表的21世纪中,专利法律制度鼓励创造者创新并保障创造者的专有权利。专利许可合同在专利技术创新及其应用方面必不可少。专利许可是专利权实施的主要形式。对专利许可合同的研究可以促进技术的应用与推广,实现利润最大化。但是目前我国对专利许可合同的研究仅限于一般的技术转让合同层面,并没有深入进行研究。本文通过借鉴合同法、专利法的基本原理,对专利许可合同涉及的一些法律问题进行研究。全文共分四章。 第一章为专利许可合同概述。主要介绍了专利许可使用权的性质,专利许可合同的立法模式以及专利许可合同的特征、标的、类型等。 第二章主要对影响专利许可合同的法律行为进行分析。首先,专利无效后,许可合同的效力问题是法律界一直探讨的问题。在实践中有很多导致专利无效的事由,而无效后许可合同的效力对合同双方当事人的利益有很大的影响。其次,无处分权人订立的专利许可合同在实践中也很容易出现,本文认为,若无其他效力瑕疵,无处分权人签订的专利许可合同应为有效合同,并对其合理性进行了详细的论证。再次,目前我国的专利许可合同的登记采取的是备案式登记,对合同引起的权利变动的登记公示功能没有体现,使得在司法实践中有很多案例得不到合理判决。本文主要对三类主要类型的许可合同区分其性质来讨论登记的必要性。 第三章探讨了专利许可合同中的一类特殊性条款——限制性商业条款。首先对限制性条款的定义进行列举,然后分析了限制性条款产生的原因以及表现形式。通过以上分析得出专利权具有专有、独占、垄断的特征使得许可人与被许可人的法律地位并不平等。其次通过各国对限制性条款的规制的比较分析,为我国限制性条款的法律规制提供了借鉴。 第四章在针对前述三章讨论的许可合同的法律问题的基础上来对我国专利许可合同相关立法完善提出自己的建议。从而可以让专利许可合同更好的发挥作用,使专利技术得到充分实施,创造更大的利润。
[Abstract]:In the 21st century, represented by patent innovation, patent law system encourages creators to innovate and protects the exclusive rights of creators. Patent license contract is indispensable in patent technology innovation and application. Patent license is the main form of patent enforcement. The research of patent license contract can promote the application and promotion of technology and realize the profit maximization. But at present, the research of patent license contract in our country is limited to the general technology transfer contract level, and has not carried on the thorough research. By referring to the basic principles of contract law and patent law, this paper studies some legal issues involved in patent license contract. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the patent license contract. This paper mainly introduces the nature of the right to use the patent license, the legislative model of the patent license contract, the characteristics, the object and the type of the patent license contract. The second chapter mainly analyzes the legal behavior that affects the patent license contract. First, after the patent is invalid, the validity of the license contract has been discussed by the legal profession. In practice, there are many reasons leading to the invalidation of patent, and the validity of the license contract after invalidation has a great influence on the interests of both parties to the contract. Secondly, the patent license contract concluded by the nowhere decentralizer is also easy to appear in practice. This paper holds that the patent license contract signed by the nowhere decentralized person should be a valid contract if there is no other defect in its validity. The rationality is demonstrated in detail. Thirdly, at present, the registration of patent license contract in our country adopts the record type registration, and the registration public function of the rights change caused by the contract is not reflected, which makes many cases can not be judged reasonably in the judicial practice. This paper discusses the necessity of registration by distinguishing the nature of three main types of license contracts. Chapter three discusses a kind of special clause in patent license contract-restrictive commercial clause. Firstly, the definition of restrictive clauses is listed, then the reasons and manifestations of restrictive clauses are analyzed. Through the above analysis, it is concluded that patent has the characteristics of exclusive, exclusive and monopoly, which makes the legal status of licensor and licensee unequal. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the restrictive clause regulation in various countries, it provides reference for the legal regulation of the restrictive clause in our country. In the fourth chapter, on the basis of the legal problems of the licensing contract discussed in the above three chapters, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the perfection of the relevant legislation of the patent licensing contract in China. Thus, the patent license contract can play a better role, make the patent technology fully implemented, and create more profits.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.42

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 彭贵;论契约自由原则的新生——契约自由与社会公正的冲突与平衡[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);1996年02期

2 董美根;;专利许可合同若干问题研究[J];电子知识产权;2009年10期

3 董美根;;我国专利许可合同登记必要性研究[J];电子知识产权;2012年02期

4 邓毅沣;;技术转让合同中限制条款法律效力评析[J];湖南社会科学;2010年02期

5 曹新明;;专利许可协议中的有色条款功能研究[J];法商研究;2007年01期

6 郑友德;胡章怡;;欧盟知识产权滥用的反垄断问题研究——以欧盟新修订的《技术许可协议集体豁免条例》为中心[J];法学评论;2006年06期

7 吴玉娟;;专利许可中专利无效的法律问题探析[J];广东广播电视大学学报;2010年03期

8 汪慧敏;;专利实施许可合同的法律审查研究[J];法制与社会;2013年12期

9 常伟;;浅析专利无效与专利合同效力的辩证关系[J];中国发明与专利;2013年08期

10 张丽娜;论国际许可合同中的限制性条款[J];河北法学;2003年03期



本文编号:1779263

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1779263.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户727b9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com