《民法总则》中的民事法律行为——基于法律行为学说的比较法分析

发布时间：2018-05-09 00:06

本文选题：民事法律行为 + 民法总则　；参考：《比较法研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：《民法总则》的通过标志着中国民法典的编纂工作取得了阶段性进展。其第六章"民事法律行为"在《民法通则》和《合同法》的基础上,补充、完善和发展了民事法律行为制度,构建了中国民法典关于民事法律行为的法律制度的基本框架,为民法典分则各编关于民事法律行为的具体规定提供了依据。从比较法的视角看,在民事法律行为的内涵与外延、作为民事法律行为的核心要素的意思表示、民事法律行为的效力规则以及附条件和附期限的民事法律行为等方面,均可将《民法总则》中的民事法律行为与德国民法上的法律行为进行比较。一方面,《民法总则》关于民事法律行为的规定继受了法律行为学说的成果;另一方面,相对于德国民法典关于法律行为的规定,《民法总则》关于民事法律行为的规定在一些方面也有所不同,它们是对改革开放以来中国民事立法和司法实践经验的总结,但其中一些规定仍有改进的余地。
[Abstract]:The adoption of the General principles of Civil Law indicates that the codification of the Chinese Civil Code has made progress in various stages. The sixth chapter, "Civil legal acts", complements, perfects and develops the system of civil legal acts on the basis of the General principles of Civil Law and contract Law, and constructs the basic framework of the legal system of Civil Law of China. It provides the basis for the specific provisions on civil legal acts in each part of the Civil Code. From the perspective of comparative law, the connotation and extension of civil legal acts, the expression of intention as the core elements of civil legal acts, the effective rules of civil legal acts and the civil legal acts with conditions and deadlines, etc. The civil legal acts in General principles of Civil Law can be compared with those in German Civil Law. On the one hand, the provisions of the General principles of Civil Law on civil legal acts are followed by the results of the doctrine of legal acts; on the other hand, Compared with the provisions of the German Civil Code on legal acts, the General provisions of the Civil Law also differ in some aspects, which are a summary of China's civil legislation and judicial practice since the reform and opening up. But there is still room for improvement in some of these rules.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;清华大学国际私法与比较法研究中心;
【分类号】：D923.1

【参考文献】