《合同法》下不安抗辩权和预期违约制度之重述——从比较《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的角度

发布时间：2018-05-21 14:40

本文选题：不安抗辩权 + 《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》　；参考：《法律适用》2004年11期

【摘要】：正预期违约规则,指的是在合同一方的义务履行期尚未届满之时,发生该方有可能无法实际履行合同义务的可能性,法律对这种情况作出的一系列规则安排。当然,这是一个很粗糙的提法,预期违约规则的具体而精确的定义需要在各个具体的法律制度下来考察,不同的法律往往对权利义务有不同的安排。但是,全球贸易的发展对规则统一性提出越来越迫切的要求,制度差异造成的成本正在变得不堪重负。《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(以下简称《公约》)中的第71和72条是统一国际上预期违约规则的一种重要努力,同时这两条也是两大法系各国制度之间博弈和妥协的一种成果。与此同时,1999年10月1日开始实施的我国《合同法》,也在中国的合同立法史上第一次相对明确而完整的设立了预期违约规则,起草过程中几易其稿,参考各国
[Abstract]:The expected breach rule refers to the possibility that a party to the contract may not be able to actually perform its contractual obligations when the period of performance of that party has not expired, and the law makes a series of rule arrangements for such a situation. Of course, this is a very rough formulation, the specific and precise definition of anticipatory breach of contract rules need to be examined under each specific legal system, different laws often have different arrangements for rights and obligations. However, the development of global trade demands the uniformity of rules more and more urgently. The costs of institutional differences are becoming unbearable. Articles 71 and 72 of the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods (hereinafter referred to as the Convention) are an important effort to harmonize the rules of international expected breach of contract, At the same time, these two articles are also a result of game and compromise between the two legal systems. At the same time, the contract Law of China, which came into effect on October 1, 1999, for the first time in the history of contract legislation in China, has set up relatively clear and complete rules for anticipatory breach of contract.
【作者单位】：北京市海淀区人民法院
【分类号】：D923.6;D997

【参考文献】