我国给付不能制度体系之考察

发布时间：2018-05-23 21:41

本文选题：给付障碍 + 不履行　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法学院学报)》2007年05期

【摘要】：我国给付障碍统一构成要件规则来自于德国"不履行"理论,但合同法并未统一法律效果,也未根据法律效果结构请求权基础,履行不能的制度功能并未因为统一构成要件而消失。在履行不能制度功能上,由于免责事由规定过窄,出现了债权人与债务人利益失衡的情形,而且没有规定对待给付当然消灭规则。在履行不能类型上,没有规定自始不能、部分不能、暂时不能、人身不能等规则,对此需要通过理论继受加以补充,在法律上还要明确经济上不能与情势变更之间的关系。在履行不能与瑕疵担保规则、风险负担规则竞合的情况下,应优先适用瑕疵担保规则、风险负担规则。
[Abstract]:The rule of uniform constitutive elements of the obstacle to payment in our country comes from the theory of "non-performance" in Germany, but the contract law has not unified the legal effect, nor has it been based on the legal effect structure of the right of claim. The system function which can not be performed has not disappeared because of the unified constitution. As to the function of performance, because of the narrow stipulation of exemption, the interests of creditor and debtor are out of balance, and there is no rule of extermination of ex officio. In terms of the type of failure to perform, there are no rules that cannot be prescribed from the beginning, part cannot, temporary inability, and personal inability, which need to be supplemented by theory, and the relationship between economic impossibility and the change of circumstances should be clearly defined in law. In the case that performance can not compete with the rules of guarantee for defects and the rules of burden of risk, the rules of guarantee of defects and rules of burden of risk should be applied first.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】