论合同债权让与的限制

发布时间：2018-06-02 11:22

  本文选题：债的移转 + 债权让与　； 参考：《大连海事大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：法律设立债权让与制度的目的在于能够实现债权人自由处分债权的意愿、规范债权人处分债权的行为,这一制度对债的流转、债的实现以及经济的发展都有积极的促进作用。正因如此,世界各国的民法均规定了债权让与制度。我国民法虽然受大陆法系的影响较深,与德国民法、日本民法和中国台湾地区在有关规定及其理论上有所借鉴,但是在物权行为的独立性和无因性的制度上,我国民法却没有因袭。因此,在债权让与制度的理论支撑上也有所争议。虽然我国的《合同法》在第79条至第83条有对债权让与的规定,但随着市场经济的发展,债权让与制度面临很多复杂的现实问题,而我国《合同法》对债权让与的规定又略显单薄,且范围局限于合同债权的让与,这给法律实务工作带来了很多疑惑与困扰。 本文在引言中举了一个案例,并提出了案例中遇到的问题,引出了对于债权让与制度的深思。 在第一部分概述中,对合同债权的概念进行了界定,分析了债权让与的必要性,债权让与制度的确立突破了债的相对性理论,并对其法律性质进行了分析。 第二部分讨论了债权让与在原则上应是自由的,但当其损害了某些需要保护的利益时也要受到限制；同时债权让与也有一些普适的规则,即在转让前应存在合法有效的债权,转让后须履行通知义务。 第三部分重点分析《合同法》第79条的三种不得转让的债权的规定,对《合同法》第79条中的根据性质不得让与和根据法律规定不得让与的债权进行了列举；对于当事人约定不得让与的债权,针对当事人约定的效力与此约定对第三人的效力进行了分析。 第四部分论文列举了无法直接适用《合同法》79条的规定的有争议的四类债权。
[Abstract]:The purpose of establishing the system of transferring creditor's rights by law is to realize the free disposition of creditor's rights, and to standardize the behavior of creditor's disposition of creditor's rights. This system has a positive effect on the circulation of debt, the realization of debt and the development of economy. For this reason, the civil law of countries all over the world has stipulated the system of assignment of creditor's rights. Although the civil law of our country is deeply influenced by the civil law system, it has some reference to the German civil law, the Japanese civil law and the Taiwan area of China in the relevant regulations and their theory, but it has the system of independence and non-causality of the act of real right. China's civil law, however, has not been inherited. Therefore, there is controversy on the theoretical support of the system of assignment of creditor's rights. Although the contract Law of our country has the stipulation of the assignment of the creditor's rights in articles 79 to 83, with the development of the market economy, the system of the assignment of the creditor's rights is faced with many complicated practical problems. However, the stipulation of the assignment of creditor's rights in contract Law of our country is a little thin, and the scope is limited to the assignment of contractual creditor's rights, which brings a lot of doubts and troubles to the practice of law. This paper presents a case in the introduction, and puts forward the problems encountered in the case, which leads to the reflection on the system of assignment of creditor's rights. In the first part, the concept of contract creditor's rights is defined, the necessity of creditor's rights transfer is analyzed, the establishment of creditor's right transfer system breaks through the relativity theory of debt, and its legal nature is analyzed. The second part discusses that the assignment of claims should be free in principle, but also restricted when it damages certain interests that need to be protected. At the same time, there are some universal rules that there should be legal and valid claims prior to the assignment. The assignment shall be subject to the obligation of notification. The third part focuses on the analysis of the three kinds of non-transferable claims in Article 79 of the contract Law, and enumerates the non-transferable and non-transferable claims according to the nature of Article 79 of the contract Law. The validity of the agreement between the parties and the third party is analyzed. The fourth part enumerates four types of claims which can not be directly applied to Article 79 of contract Law.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 郑一s，

本文编号：1968579