论预约合同的成立标准
发布时间:2018-06-10 06:28
本文选题:合同 + 预约 ; 参考:《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:在经济全球化全面推进的当下,合同,由于其与市场经济的密切联系而稳居于法律界重者恒重的地位,同时也由于市场的飞速发展与交易的日趋复杂,合同法律的滞后性更加凸显。是故,对以古典契约理论为基础的整个合同制度进行反思、补阙、创新,使之适应、促进、引领经济的发展,是当下合同法律发展的必由之路。本文正是选取合同法上旧理论与新形势碰撞的一个“青黄不接”之处——预约合同来进行研究,重点探讨预约合同的成立标准问题。 本文第一章,在对预约合同进行简要背景概述之后,主要介绍了两则预约合同典型案例,一为商品房买卖合同方面的再审案件,一为劳动合同方面的二审案件,引出预约合同的成立问题及商品房认购书、意向书、三方协议等与预约合同的关系问题。第二章,重点探讨预约合同的成立问题在实践运用中产生问题的原因,初步归结为立法上缺失预约合同的成立标准,法律解释片面而笼统,对预约的特征及与相关概念的区别掌握不清等几大成因。第三章,,针对预约合同的成立方面产生的问题及原因进行各个击破,着力从区分概念、完善立法等方面摸索出一套预约合同的成立标准。第四章,将总结出的预约合同成立标准进行实践运用,并用以解决第一章所提出的两个案例的相关问题。 本文的探讨虽然角度较小,但希望以小见大,希望能为预约合同的制度构筑添砖加瓦。
[Abstract]:At the present time when the economic globalization is advancing in an all-round way, the contract, because of its close relationship with the market economy, is firmly in the position of the heavyweight in the legal profession, and at the same time, because of the rapid development of the market and the increasing complexity of the transaction, The lag of contract law is more prominent. Therefore, it is the only way for the development of contract law to reflect on, supplement, innovate, adapt, promote and lead the development of economy on the basis of classical contract theory. In this paper, the author chooses the old theory of contract law to collide with the new situation, that is, the reservation contract, which is the place of collision between the old theory and the new situation, and focuses on discussing the standard of the establishment of the contract reservation. After a brief background summary of the reservation contract, this paper mainly introduces two typical cases of the reservation contract, one is the retrial case in the commercial housing sale contract, the other is the second instance case in the aspect of the labor contract. This paper introduces the establishment of the reservation contract and the relationship between the purchase of the commercial house, the letter of intent, the tripartite agreement and the reservation contract. In the second chapter, the author focuses on the reasons for the problems in the practice of the establishment of the appointment contract, which are primarily attributed to the lack of legal standards for the establishment of the reservation contract, the one-sided and general interpretation of the law. The characteristics of reservation and the differences with related concepts are not clear and so on several major causes. In the third chapter, the author tries to break down the problems and causes of the establishment of the reservation contract, and tries to find out a set of standards of the contract from the aspects of distinguishing the concept, perfecting the legislation, and so on. In the fourth chapter, the conclusion of the contract formation criteria is put into practice and used to solve the related problems of the two cases in the first chapter. Although the perspective of this paper is small, it is hoped that it can be seen from a small point of view. Hope to make a contribution to the system of appointment contract.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 张权;对就业协议书的思考[J];高等理科教育;2005年01期
2 徐国栋;民法典草案的基本结构——以民法的调整对象理论为中心[J];法学研究;2000年01期
3 秦文献;大学生就业协议:典型的预约合同[J];中国劳动;2005年01期
4 李秀民;;预约若干法律问题探析[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年01期
5 杜立聪;;预约合同的法律效力[J];商场现代化;2006年17期
6 孙自如;刘瑰;;商品房预售认购书相关问题研究[J];社会科学论坛;2005年07期
本文编号:2002284
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2002284.html