南海划界问题的国际法分析

发布时间：2018-01-04 21:14

本文关键词：南海划界问题的国际法分析　出处：《广西师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：1982年《联合国海洋法公约》在南海海域适用后,南海问题变得更为复杂和多变。南海周边各国,为了各自在南海地区的利益,争夺南海水域的油气资源,歪曲史实,不断挑起岛屿主权争端,南海成为世界上的“热点海域”。南海问题的关键在于南海海域的划界,南海问题的实质是南海划界问题。南海划界问题是目前影响亚太地区和平稳定与发展的主要因素之一,南海划界问题已经成为当前和今后影响中国和平发展,以及中国与东南亚国家,特别是卷入争端的有关国家关系发展的一大障碍。在南海划界问题上,南海周边各国纷纷提出了各自的划界主张,通过国内立法,宣布领海基线,明确专属经济区和大陆架范围。但是这些划界主张严重侵害了我国在南海海域的历史权利,严重侵犯了我国在南海海域的历史主权。其基于陆地领土自然延伸提出的划界主张缺乏国际法的支持,是得不到国际社会认可的。在南海划界问题上,南海各国应尊重我国在南海海域的历史性权利,尊重我国南海九段线内水域和所属岛屿的主权,按照公平原则这个国际习惯法规则解决划界问题。本文从法律角度出发,利用国际法特别是国际海洋法这一工具对南海划界问题进行分析研究,结合南海周边各国所主张的划界依据,评析南海各国在划界问题上所反映出的实质,探寻我国应当奉行的政策,分析现存的南海划界争端解决模式存在的问题,并讨论在中国—东盟框架下如何暂时搁置南海划界争端,建立共同开发机制,实现南海地区的共同繁荣。全文分为三个部分进行分析。第一部分对南海划界争端进行概述。第二部分对南海划界争端模式进行分析研究。第三部分提出在中国—东盟框架下合作解决南海划界争端的具体方式。在第一部分,首先概述了南海划界争端的历史由来,介绍南海划界争端现实的复杂性和我国面临的形势。其次分析南海各国对南海划界的主张及国际法依据。并分析中国及南海各国划界主张的特点。利用国际法尤其是海洋法这一工具,对各国主张进行法理评析,得出南海各国无视我国南海主权的划界主张是违背国际法原则的。在第二部分,对几种争端解决方案进行研究分析,包括：四分区划界法、共同使用区划界法、海洋公园划界法。分析利用政治手段和通过国际法途径解决解决南海划界争端的优势与不利。在第三部分,提出在中国—东盟框架下,“搁置争议,共同开发”以合作促进南海问题的解决是目前解决划界争端的趋势。以东盟相关合作文件为基础,严格恪守《南海各方行为宣言》,采用共同合作的方式,在法律的框架下,克服困难和阻力,逐步推进,逐渐深化,共谋南海发展的新明天。
[Abstract]:The delimitation of the South China Sea has become one of the main factors affecting the peace and stability and development in the South China Sea . The delimitation of the South China Sea has become one of the main factors affecting the peace and stability and development in the South China Sea . The whole text is divided into three parts . The first part gives an overview of the delimitation dispute in the South China Sea . The second part analyzes the delimitation dispute model of the South China Sea . The third part proposes the concrete way to cooperate to resolve the maritime boundary dispute under the framework of China - ASEAN . In the first part , firstly , the historical origin of the delimitation dispute in the South China Sea is summarized , the complexity of the delimitation dispute in the South China Sea and the situation facing our country are introduced . Secondly , the author analyzes the characteristics of the delimitation of the South China Sea , and analyses the characteristics of the delimitation of China and the South China Sea . The author concludes that the delimitation of the South China Sea sovereignty by the use of international law , especially the law of the sea , is contrary to the principles of international law . In the second part , several kinds of dispute settlement methods are studied and analyzed , including the division boundary method , the division boundary method , the maritime park boundary method , the analysis and utilization of political means and the solution of the advantages and disadvantages of the dispute settlement in the South China Sea by means of international law . In the third part , it is suggested that under the framework of China - ASEAN , the settlement of " shelving disputes and common development " to cooperate to promote the South China Sea issue is the current trend of solving the demarcation dispute .

【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D823;D922.6

【引证文献】