当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

论现代环境伦理对我国环境立法的影响

发布时间:2018-03-10 14:24

  本文选题:环境伦理 切入点:环境立法 出处:《重庆大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】: 目前,尽管我国政府将环境保护作为一项基本国策,也不断加大对环境保护的宣传力度,但我国环境与资源恶化现状还是不容乐观。学界一致认为我国现行环境法已经远远的与现实需要脱节,必须对其进行适度修改和完善,以求更好的保护我国环境资源。对环境立法的完善可以从各个角度进行审视,本文试图从环境伦理的角度考察我国立法的不足,并在此基础上提出相应的立法完善。 本文第一部分首先阐述了环境伦理的含义以及与环境法的关系,正如道德与法的关系一样,认为环境伦理与环境法是相互推动呈螺旋式上升发展的关系。环境伦理是环境立法的基础,环境伦理与环境立法相互促进,两种规范相互补充。 第二部分详细介绍了现代环境伦理的几种主流观点。具体介绍了开明的人类中心主义、动物解放论、生物平等主义、生态整体主义以及可持续发展观,阐述了这五种环境伦理观的含义,并认为它们可在环境立法的不同层面和领域推动着环境立法的发展。 第三部分通过仔细分析我国现行环境法,得出其既有值得肯定之处也有尚需完善的地方。其中的某些法律原则和具体法律制度符合环境伦理观的评价。同时指出现行环境法的不足和空白,表现为:立法目的未能体现可持续发展的环境伦理观;生态环境保护缺失生态整体主义的伦理观,不能很好的保护后代人利益;另外,生物平等主义和动物解放/权利论的环境伦理观也存在欠缺,亟需完善生物多样性的立法和动物福利立法。 第四部分针对前一部分指出的问题,从种种环境伦理观的角度出发,对立法目的、立法原则、法律制度层面进行完善和立法建议。指出:应当将现行立法目的改进为可持续发展的目的;从生态整体主义出发,建议将协调发展原则充实为以生态整体利益优先的协调发展;从开明的人类中心主义出发,确认公众参与原则,从而更好的维护后代人利益;从生物平等主义出发,制定生物多样性制度;从动物解放论出发,对动物福利立法,同时提出生物多样性和动物福利立法的立法思路。
[Abstract]:At present, although our government regards environmental protection as a basic national policy, it has also continuously increased its publicity efforts on environmental protection. However, the current situation of environmental and resource deterioration in China is still not optimistic. In order to better protect our country's environmental resources, the perfection of environmental legislation can be examined from various angles. This paper attempts to examine the deficiency of our country's legislation from the angle of environmental ethics, and puts forward the corresponding legislative perfection on this basis. The first part of this paper first expounds the meaning of environmental ethics and its relationship with environmental law, just as the relationship between morality and law. Environmental ethics and environmental law are the basis of environmental legislation, the environmental ethics and environmental legislation promote each other, and the two kinds of norms complement each other. The second part introduces several mainstream views of modern environmental ethics in detail, including enlightened anthropocentrism, animal liberation theory, biological egalitarianism, ecological holism and sustainable development view. This paper expounds the meaning of these five kinds of environmental ethics, and thinks that they can promote the development of environmental legislation in different aspects and fields of environmental legislation. The third part through the careful analysis of China's current environmental law, Some of the legal principles and specific legal systems are in line with the concept of environmental ethics. At the same time, it points out the deficiencies and gaps in the current environmental law, It is shown as follows: the legislative purpose fails to embody the environmental ethics view of sustainable development; the ecological environmental protection lacks the ethics view of ecological holism, which can not protect the interests of future generations; in addition, The environmental ethics of biologism and animal liberation / right theory are also deficient, and it is urgent to perfect the legislation on biodiversity and animal welfare. 4th in view of the problems pointed out in the previous part, from the point of view of various environmental ethics, the legislative purpose, legislative principles, It is pointed out that the purpose of current legislation should be improved for the purpose of sustainable development, and that the principle of coordinated development should be enriched by the principle of coordinated development in view of ecological holism. Proceeding from enlightened anthropocentrism and affirming the principle of public participation, so as to better safeguard the interests of future generations; proceeding from the doctrine of biological equality, formulating the system of biodiversity; starting from the theory of animal liberation, legislating on animal welfare, At the same time, the legislative thinking of biodiversity and animal welfare legislation is put forward.
【学位授予单位】:重庆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.68

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 张志可;“天人合一”传统环境伦理思想的当代法律价值[D];云南民族大学;2012年



本文编号:1593724

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1593724.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7245d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com