美国自然资源产权体系与中国自然资源物权体系的比较分析

发布时间：2018-03-21 14:42

本文选题：自然资源　切入点：所有权　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2012年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国自然资源物权体系与美国自然资源产权体系是从不同的角度去构建各自的权利体系。中国自然资源物权体系不具有美国经营权人(Proprietor)和管理权人(Claimant)的概念。中国自然资源的用益物权人的权利仅相当于美国自然资源产权体系中授权使用者(Authorized User)所持有的准入权和收取权,因为我国用益物权人不具有美国管理权和专属权这类决策性权利。美国自然资源产权体系通过下放政府的一部分管理权和专属权给经营权人和管理权人,为其进行长期投资自然资源和建设绿色自然资源提供动力,并且为自然资源经营权人和管理权人承担保护、改善、管理自然资源和生态补偿等义务提供法律基础。这为我国尽可能合理发挥一项自然资源的价值,为自然资源的绿色开发、合理投资、合理管理养护提供域外借鉴。
[Abstract]:The Chinese natural resource real right system and the American natural resource property right system construct their respective rights system from different angles. The Chinese natural resources real right system does not have the concepts of American management owner (Proprietor) and management authority (claim). The rights of usufruct owners of national natural resources are only equivalent to the access and receiving rights held by authorized users in the natural resource property system of the United States. Because the usufruct owners in our country do not have such decision-making rights as the management and exclusive rights of the United States, the American natural resources property rights system devolves part of the management and exclusive rights of the government to the managers and managers. To provide the impetus for their long-term investment in natural resources and the construction of green natural resources, and to undertake the protection and improvement of natural resource operators and managers, It provides the legal basis for our country to give full play to the value of a natural resource, to the green development of natural resources, to reasonable investment, and to the rational management and conservation of natural resources, which provides a legal basis for the management of natural resources and ecological compensation.
【作者单位】：西南交通大学法学系;
【基金】：西南交通大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“四川自然资源权益交易法律研究”(SWJTU092ZT40)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D912.6

【共引文献】