环境公益诉讼两造结构模式研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 00:40

本文选题：环境公益诉讼 + 两造结构　；参考：《江西社会科学》2017年02期

【摘要】：公权主导下的环境公益诉讼两造结构模式既限制了适格原告的范围,又在很大程度上阻碍了正确被告的寻找,更使原本应当保持中立的司法机关有了越俎代庖的倾向,这是我国当前环境公益诉讼制度运行不畅的重要原因。通过对国外同类制度进行比较可以发现:尽管同属社会主导模式,各国环境公益诉讼两造结构模式的差异悬殊,与各国的法律文化传统以及环保政策导向有关。完善我国环境公益诉讼两造结构模式的基本方向是从公权主导向社会主导转变。具体说来,就是要在尽快建立环境行政公益诉讼制度的基础上,确立符合我国国情的原告序位制度和被告选择制度,与此同时,应当确保司法机关在面对两造对抗时进行有限度的能动司法,实现环境公益诉讼审判的不偏不倚。
[Abstract]:The dual structure model of environmental public interest litigation under the public right not only limits the scope of suitable plaintiff, but also hinders the search for the correct defendant to a great extent, and makes the judicial organ that should be neutral have the tendency to preempt it. This is our country's current environmental public interest litigation system running unobstructed important reasons. Through the comparison of the similar systems in foreign countries, it can be found that the differences between the two modes of environmental public interest litigation in different countries are related to the legal and cultural tradition of countries and the orientation of environmental protection policies, even though they belong to the same social dominant mode. The basic direction of perfecting the structure model of environmental public interest litigation in our country is from public power leading to social leading. Specifically, on the basis of establishing the environmental administrative public interest litigation system as soon as possible, it is necessary to establish the plaintiff order system and the defendant selection system in line with the national conditions of our country, and at the same time, It is necessary to ensure the judicial organs to carry out limited active justice in the face of confrontation and to realize the impartiality of the trial of environmental public interest litigation.
【作者单位】：中南大学;中南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“中国特色环境公益诉讼理论与制度研究”(14AFX023)
【分类号】：D922.68

【相似文献】