论差别生态责任
发布时间：2018-08-03 12:52
【摘要】：自从1989年颁布现行《环境保护法》以来,我国环境立法从无到有,逐步形成较完整的环境法体系,然而,随着生态环境立法迅速发展,我国的环境污染及自然资源破坏却日趋严重。一个重要的原因在于目前的环境责任理论已经无法满足环境保护与生态改善的要求。在这个生态危机日益凸显的时代,势必要对环境责任理论进行改革与完善。考虑到社会实际发展状况,结合环境保护的需要,本文意图创新环境责任理论,在对传统环境法律责任和生态责任分析研究的基础上,从一个新的角度挖掘环境责任的潜在意义,提出差别生态责任理论并进行研究。 差别生态责任是建立在生态责任的基础上,而生态责任是在克服环境法律责任的基础上进行讨论的,生态责任强调一种积极治理环境和保护生态的义务。全文分为四个部分,首先由环境法律责任引出生态责任,加入“差别”二字,引出主题差别生态责任,从正当性和可行性来论证“差别”的意义,从不同主体和不同地域来阐明差别生态责任的内容,最后提出通过生态补偿和环境税来实现差别生态责任。这四部分的主要内容如下：第一部分从传统的环境法律责任入手,分析其缺陷与不足,进而讨论一种较为完善的责任形式即生态责任,在对生态责任深入分析的基础上,引出本文的研究主题即差别生态责任,并明确其概念和基本内容。第二部分从必要性和可行性两个方面论证差别生态责任的正当性,适当运用生态学的基本理论知识,借鉴国际环境法共同但有区别的责任原则,结合现行法中已有的研究成果,为差别生态责任的存在与发展提供理论和实践的有力支持。第三部分从主体不同(管理者、受益者、利用者和破坏者)和地域不同(优先开发区、重点开发区、限制开发区和禁止开发区)两方面详细阐述差别生态责任的内容。第四部分通过创新现行法中生态补偿和环境税两个方面来落实差别生态责任。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the current Environmental Protection Law in 1989, environmental legislation in our country has gradually formed a relatively complete environmental law system from scratch. However, with the rapid development of ecological environment legislation, However, environmental pollution and natural resources destruction are becoming more and more serious in China. An important reason is that the current theory of environmental responsibility can not meet the requirements of environmental protection and ecological improvement. In this era of ecological crisis, it is necessary to reform and perfect the theory of environmental responsibility. Considering the actual development of society and the needs of environmental protection, this paper intends to innovate the theory of environmental responsibility, on the basis of the analysis and study of the traditional environmental legal responsibility and ecological responsibility. In this paper, the potential significance of environmental responsibility is explored from a new angle, and the theory of differential ecological responsibility is put forward and studied. The differential ecological responsibility is based on the ecological responsibility, and the ecological responsibility is discussed on the basis of overcoming the legal responsibility of the environment. Ecological responsibility emphasizes an obligation to actively manage the environment and protect the ecology. The full text is divided into four parts. Firstly, the ecological responsibility is induced by the environmental legal responsibility, the word "difference" is added, and the theme of different ecological responsibility is elicited. The significance of "difference" is demonstrated from the perspective of legitimacy and feasibility. This paper expounds the content of different ecological responsibility from different subjects and different regions, and finally proposes to realize the differential ecological responsibility through ecological compensation and environmental tax. The main contents of the four parts are as follows: the first part begins with the traditional environmental legal liability, analyzes its defects and deficiencies, and then discusses a more perfect form of responsibility, ecological responsibility, on the basis of in-depth analysis of ecological responsibility, The research subject of this paper is differentiated ecological responsibility, and its concept and basic content are clarified. The second part demonstrates the legitimacy of different ecological responsibility from two aspects of necessity and feasibility, applies the basic theoretical knowledge of ecology properly, draws lessons from the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities of international environmental law, and combines the existing research results in current law. To provide theoretical and practical support for the existence and development of differential ecological responsibility. The third part elaborates the content of different ecological responsibility from two aspects: different subjects (managers, beneficiaries, users and saboteurs) and different regions (priority development zones, key development zones, restricted development zones and forbidden development zones). The fourth part implements the differential ecological responsibility by innovating the ecological compensation and environmental tax in the current law.
【学位授予单位】：山东科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.68
本文编号：2161801
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the current Environmental Protection Law in 1989, environmental legislation in our country has gradually formed a relatively complete environmental law system from scratch. However, with the rapid development of ecological environment legislation, However, environmental pollution and natural resources destruction are becoming more and more serious in China. An important reason is that the current theory of environmental responsibility can not meet the requirements of environmental protection and ecological improvement. In this era of ecological crisis, it is necessary to reform and perfect the theory of environmental responsibility. Considering the actual development of society and the needs of environmental protection, this paper intends to innovate the theory of environmental responsibility, on the basis of the analysis and study of the traditional environmental legal responsibility and ecological responsibility. In this paper, the potential significance of environmental responsibility is explored from a new angle, and the theory of differential ecological responsibility is put forward and studied. The differential ecological responsibility is based on the ecological responsibility, and the ecological responsibility is discussed on the basis of overcoming the legal responsibility of the environment. Ecological responsibility emphasizes an obligation to actively manage the environment and protect the ecology. The full text is divided into four parts. Firstly, the ecological responsibility is induced by the environmental legal responsibility, the word "difference" is added, and the theme of different ecological responsibility is elicited. The significance of "difference" is demonstrated from the perspective of legitimacy and feasibility. This paper expounds the content of different ecological responsibility from different subjects and different regions, and finally proposes to realize the differential ecological responsibility through ecological compensation and environmental tax. The main contents of the four parts are as follows: the first part begins with the traditional environmental legal liability, analyzes its defects and deficiencies, and then discusses a more perfect form of responsibility, ecological responsibility, on the basis of in-depth analysis of ecological responsibility, The research subject of this paper is differentiated ecological responsibility, and its concept and basic content are clarified. The second part demonstrates the legitimacy of different ecological responsibility from two aspects of necessity and feasibility, applies the basic theoretical knowledge of ecology properly, draws lessons from the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities of international environmental law, and combines the existing research results in current law. To provide theoretical and practical support for the existence and development of differential ecological responsibility. The third part elaborates the content of different ecological responsibility from two aspects: different subjects (managers, beneficiaries, users and saboteurs) and different regions (priority development zones, key development zones, restricted development zones and forbidden development zones). The fourth part implements the differential ecological responsibility by innovating the ecological compensation and environmental tax in the current law.
【学位授予单位】：山东科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.68
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱晓;;公共管理中政府生态责任分析[J];北方经济;2007年19期
2 莫光财;张东豫;;缺失与斧正——从行政生态到生态行政[J];长白学刊;2008年02期
3 王素娟;;论生态公正[J];赤峰学院学报(自然科学版);2007年05期
4 ;国务院出台关于编制全国主体功能区规划的意见[J];城市规划通讯;2007年15期
5 曹明德;;对建立生态补偿法律机制的再思考[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
6 黄明健;;论作为整体公平的生态正义[J];东南学术;2006年05期
7 刘青;胡振鹏;;江河源区生态系统服务价值评估初探——以江西东江源区为例[J];湖泊科学;2007年03期
8 陈泉生;论科学发展观与法律的生态化[J];法学杂志;2005年05期
9 童年生，，黄顺;差别原则──平等原则的辅题[J];法学杂志;1995年02期
10 王树义;;生态安全及其立法问题探讨[J];法学评论;2006年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 记者 王涛;[N];经济参考报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王哲林;可持续发展条件下我国环境税有关问题研究[D];厦门大学;2007年
2 侯凤岐;生态资源价值补偿机制研究[D];西北大学;2008年
3 尤艳馨;我国国家生态补偿体系研究[D];河北工业大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 刘莉;我国环境税收制度的建立与完善[D];东北林业大学;2003年
2 谢玲;试论共同但有区别责任原则[D];湖南师范大学;2005年
3 王良海;我国生态补偿法律制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2006年
4 王英;水电工程陆生生态环境影响评价与生态管理研究[D];西北大学;2007年
5 王鑫鹏;中国环境税收制度研究[D];东北师范大学;2007年
6 王宁军;中国西部生态补偿法律制度研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2008年
7 贺娟;基于社区的鄱阳湖区湿地生态系统服务与生态补偿研究[D];江西师范大学;2009年
本文编号：2161801
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2161801.html
