我国矿业权相邻关系问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-14 17:12

【摘要】： 本文依循一种从一般到特殊的解决问题的思路,从发现问题到解决问题再到寻求一般的法律机制,综合运用比较分析、系统分析、文献查阅和实际调查等手段,对文章论题——我国矿业权相邻关系问题展开分析和探讨。本文共包括以下六个部分: 第一部分:相邻关系理论的价值和发展趋势。文章通过论述,认为相邻关系理论的价值在于通过法律的直接规定,协调相邻不动产权利人之间的利益冲突,是一方的权利为一定的扩张或限缩,以促进物的有效利用,防免纠纷的发生,从而创造平和的社会生产和生活秩序。文章从几个方面对相邻关系理论的发展作了阐述,通过以上两个方面的归纳,为后面矿业权相邻关系的分析和论述铺开路子。第二部分:矿业权相邻关系的基本内容。本部分对矿业权的概念和性质进行了介绍,指出矿业权是派生于矿产资源权的准物权。本部分对矿业权相邻关系的内容进行了具体的罗列:主要包括相邻提供便利关系和相邻安全防险关系。第三部分:域外主要国家和地区立法中矿业权相邻关系的规定。本部分对澳大利亚西澳洲、我国台湾地区、韩国等国家和地区的立法中相关规定进行比较研究,分析了其利弊和特点,以为我国的立法借鉴之用。第四部分:我国矿业权相邻关系法律规定现状及存在的问题。本部分对我国目前的相关规定进行了梳理,并对立法中存在的问题进行了分析,我国在此方面的立法缺失给相邻关系各方权利的行使造成诸多障碍。第五部分:我国矿业权相邻关系法律调整的应然分析。本部分对矿业权相邻关系的法律调整内容进行了具体的分析,包括各相邻权的行使要件。另外,相邻关系和地役权制度关系紧密,相邻关系是法律直接对相毗邻的双方权利主体行使权利作出规定,进行的是对权利人正常行使权利作出最低的法律保障。当这种法律的最低保障不能满足权利主体的需要时,就要借助于地役权的制度设计。矿业权行使中也会出现这种状况,所以,本部分对矿业权行使中地役权的设定也进行一并的探讨,以利于问题解决方法的完整性,所以本部分认为,对超出相邻关系所能调整的权利义务范围,应付诸地役权制度加以解决。第六部分:关于我国矿业权相邻关系的立法设想。本部分对我国《物权法》、《矿产资源法》、《土地管理法》等相关法律的制定和修改作了设想,提出了立法建议。认为,《物权法》中应对不动产相邻关系和地役权适用主体加以明确;《物权法》中应对相邻关系和地役权适用范围加以拓展;《矿产资源法》和《土地管理法》应相应增加对矿业权相邻关系和地役权制度的规定。
[Abstract]:This paper follows a way of thinking from general to special problem solving, from finding problem to solving problem to seeking general legal mechanism, comprehensive use of comparative analysis, systematic analysis, literature review and actual investigation, etc. This paper analyzes and probes into the adjacent relation of mining rights in China. This paper includes the following six parts: the first part: the value and development trend of the theory of neighbor relation. This paper argues that the value of the theory of adjacent relations lies in the coordination of the conflict of interests between the owners of adjacent real estate rights through the direct regulation of the law, which is the expansion or contraction of the rights of one party in order to promote the effective use of objects. Prevent the occurrence of disputes, thus creating a peaceful social production and life order. This paper expounds the development of the theory of adjacent relation from several aspects, through the induction of the above two aspects, it opens the way for the analysis and discussion of the adjacent relation of mining right. The second part: the basic content of the adjacent relation of mining right. This part introduces the concept and nature of mining rights and points out that mining rights are quasi-real rights derived from mineral resources rights. In this part, the contents of the adjacent relation of mining rights are listed concretely: including the convenience relation of adjacent supply and the relation of adjacent security and insurance. The third part: the regulation of adjacent relation of mining right in the legislation of foreign countries and regions. This part makes a comparative study of the relevant provisions in the legislation of Australia and Western Australia, Taiwan and South Korea, and analyzes its advantages, disadvantages and characteristics for the reference of our country's legislation. The fourth part: the present situation and existing problems of the legal regulation of the adjacent relation of mining right in China. This part combs the relevant provisions of our country at present, and analyzes the existing problems in the legislation. The lack of legislation in this respect has caused many obstacles to the exercise of the rights of the neighboring parties. The fifth part: the analysis of the legal adjustment of the adjacent relation of mining right in China. This part has carried on the concrete analysis to the mining right adjacent relation legal adjustment content, including each adjacent right exercise element. In addition, the adjoining relationship is closely related to the easement system. The adjacent relationship is that the law directly provides for the exercise of the rights of the adjacent parties, and the minimum legal guarantee for the normal exercise of the rights of the obligee. When the minimum protection of this kind of law can not meet the needs of the subject, the system design of easement is needed. This situation will also occur in the exercise of mining rights, so this part discusses the establishment of easements in the exercise of mining rights, in order to facilitate the integrity of the solution, so this part believes, The system of easement should be solved beyond the range of rights and obligations that can be adjusted by neighboring relations. The sixth part: the legislation assumption about the adjacent relation of mining right in our country. In this part, the formulation and modification of the relevant laws, such as the Real right Law, the Mineral Resources Law and the Land Management Law, are envisaged, and legislative suggestions are put forward. The author thinks that the adjacent relation and easement of immovable property should be clearly defined in the Real right Law; the applicable scope of adjacent relation and easement should be expanded in the Real right Law; and the mineral resources law and the land management law should be related to each other. Should increase to mining right adjacent relation and easement system regulation.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923;D922.62

【相似文献】