论动物权利及其实现
发布时间：2018-10-08 07:40
【摘要】：动物权利理论因其和传统的法学理论有诸多不和谐的地方,从其出现就备受争议。西方国家有关动物权利的研究已经有了百年历史,动物权利保护法也日益丰富和成熟。我国法学界关于动物权利的研究仍然停留在动物是否拥有权利,以及动物权利能否实现等基本问题上。当今动物权利问题已经成为国际性的前沿课题,研究动物是否应该享有权利以及如何实现动物权利,对于传统法学如何发展至关重要。如果动物不能享有权利,传统法学将按照自己的轨迹继续发展；如果动物应该享有权利,传统法学将接受更大的挑战,传统的法学理论和民法典的体系和内容将会是另一番面貌；据此,本课题的研究对于我国法学理论及民法学体系有着至关重要的意义。 本文共分六部分,第一部分是引言；第二部分是动物权利思想的梳理；第三部分是动物权利的理论基础；第四部分是动物权利的基本原则和基本内容；第五部分是动物权利的实现。第六部分是结语。 本文开始对动物权利思想进行了疏理。首先介绍了动物权利的定义和概念,然后介绍了动物权利的历史发展,并对动物权利两大派别进行了比较分析。 论文继而探讨了动物权利的理论基础。当代最具代表性的动物权利思想的理论基础是道德关怀。道德起源于动物的本性和社会本能,动物作为自然界的成员,享有与人类一样的自然道德权利。然而,动物的道德权利却被人类忽视了,因此动物的道德权利应该以法律的形式确立下来,动物道德权利的法律化也是民法绿化趋势的必然要求。论文第四部分确立了动物权利应该遵循的基本原则和内容。确立动物权 利应该遵循四个基本原则即遵守自然规则、人道对待原则、平等考虑原则和区别原则,其次提出动物权利的基本内容包括生存权、发展权、竞争权、善待权,并对动物权利进行了分类。 本文第五部分探讨了动物权利的实现。动物权利的提出势必会引发动物法律地位的问题,事实上,法律主体和客体具有历史选择性,动物处于何种法律地位不影响动物权利的实现,动物权利可以通过代理制度实现。论文最后提出了如何建构我国现阶段的动物权利制度。 本文的最后一部分是结语。
[Abstract]:The theory of animal rights is controversial from its appearance because of its disharmony with the traditional theory of law. The research on animal rights in western countries has a history of 100 years, and animal rights protection law is increasingly rich and mature. The research on animal rights in Chinese legal circles is still focused on whether animals have rights and whether animal rights can be realized. Nowadays, the issue of animal rights has become an international frontier issue. It is very important to study whether animals should enjoy rights and how to realize animal rights. If animals do not enjoy rights, traditional jurisprudence will continue to develop in its own way; if animals should enjoy rights, traditional jurisprudence will take on greater challenges. The traditional theory of law and the system and content of the civil code will be a different face, so the study of this subject is of great significance to the theory of law and the system of civil law of our country. This paper is divided into six parts, the first part is the introduction; the second part is the combing of animal rights; the third part is the theoretical basis of animal rights; the fourth part is the basic principles and contents of animal rights; The fifth part is the realization of animal rights. The sixth part is the conclusion. This article begins to dredge the idea of animal rights. This paper first introduces the definition and concept of animal rights, then introduces the historical development of animal rights, and makes a comparative analysis of the two groups of animal rights. The paper then discusses the theoretical basis of animal rights. Moral care is the theoretical basis of the most representative thought of animal rights. Morality originates from the nature and social instinct of animals. As members of nature, animals enjoy the same natural moral rights as human beings. However, the moral rights of animals are ignored by human beings, so the moral rights of animals should be established in the form of law, and the legalization of animal moral rights is the inevitable requirement of the trend of greening in civil law. The fourth part of the paper establishes the basic principles and contents of animal rights. The establishment of animal rights and interests should follow four basic principles, that is, following the natural rules, the principle of humane treatment, the principle of equal consideration and the principle of distinction. Secondly, the basic contents of animal rights include the right to survival, the right to development, and the right to competition. The right to treat well, and the classification of animal rights. The fifth part discusses the realization of animal rights. The proposition of animal rights will inevitably lead to the question of the legal status of animals. In fact, the subject and object of law have historical selectivity. The legal status of animals does not affect the realization of animal rights, and animal rights can be realized through the agency system. Finally, the paper puts forward how to construct the system of animal rights in our country. The last part of this paper is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D912.6
本文编号：2255961
[Abstract]:The theory of animal rights is controversial from its appearance because of its disharmony with the traditional theory of law. The research on animal rights in western countries has a history of 100 years, and animal rights protection law is increasingly rich and mature. The research on animal rights in Chinese legal circles is still focused on whether animals have rights and whether animal rights can be realized. Nowadays, the issue of animal rights has become an international frontier issue. It is very important to study whether animals should enjoy rights and how to realize animal rights. If animals do not enjoy rights, traditional jurisprudence will continue to develop in its own way; if animals should enjoy rights, traditional jurisprudence will take on greater challenges. The traditional theory of law and the system and content of the civil code will be a different face, so the study of this subject is of great significance to the theory of law and the system of civil law of our country. This paper is divided into six parts, the first part is the introduction; the second part is the combing of animal rights; the third part is the theoretical basis of animal rights; the fourth part is the basic principles and contents of animal rights; The fifth part is the realization of animal rights. The sixth part is the conclusion. This article begins to dredge the idea of animal rights. This paper first introduces the definition and concept of animal rights, then introduces the historical development of animal rights, and makes a comparative analysis of the two groups of animal rights. The paper then discusses the theoretical basis of animal rights. Moral care is the theoretical basis of the most representative thought of animal rights. Morality originates from the nature and social instinct of animals. As members of nature, animals enjoy the same natural moral rights as human beings. However, the moral rights of animals are ignored by human beings, so the moral rights of animals should be established in the form of law, and the legalization of animal moral rights is the inevitable requirement of the trend of greening in civil law. The fourth part of the paper establishes the basic principles and contents of animal rights. The establishment of animal rights and interests should follow four basic principles, that is, following the natural rules, the principle of humane treatment, the principle of equal consideration and the principle of distinction. Secondly, the basic contents of animal rights include the right to survival, the right to development, and the right to competition. The right to treat well, and the classification of animal rights. The fifth part discusses the realization of animal rights. The proposition of animal rights will inevitably lead to the question of the legal status of animals. In fact, the subject and object of law have historical selectivity. The legal status of animals does not affect the realization of animal rights, and animal rights can be realized through the agency system. Finally, the paper puts forward how to construct the system of animal rights in our country. The last part of this paper is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D912.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吕忠梅;如何“绿化”民法典[J];法学;2003年09期
2 殷啸虎;;“人道屠宰”是动物依自然法则享有的权利[J];法学;2008年01期
3 陈娟;;动物权利的法理思辨——兼论环境法对“人类中心主义”的克服[J];法制与社会;2007年02期
4 肖磊;;对动物权利的法学思考[J];法制与社会;2009年13期
5 詹磊;;也评动物权利之争——为激进的动物权利观辩护[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2008年08期
6 尹生;;关于动物权利的法学思考——兼论中国动物保护法的构建[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
7 王干,万志前;动物权利与生态保护[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
8 唐大森;王学忠;;论动物的权利主体地位[J];科技与法律;2009年05期
9 杨立新,朱呈义;动物法律人格之否定——兼论动物之法律“物格”[J];法学研究;2004年05期
10 腾延娟;;关于动物法律主体地位研究综述[J];洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 秦思;动物权利研究[D];吉林大学;2006年
2 张如明;动物的法律保护[D];山东大学;2007年
3 王洁;“动物权利”之理论述评[D];南京师范大学;2008年
，本文编号：2255961
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2255961.html
