环境民事纠纷解决机制研究
[Abstract]:The construction and perfection of diversified environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism is a trend of development. In order to alleviate the increasingly serious environmental crisis, it seems to be urgent to solve the environmental civil dispute in order to solve the environmental civil dispute. However, how to construct and perfect is a difficult problem in front of us. This paper discusses this problem from the perspective of environmental law. Firstly, it analyzes the meaning and classification of environmental disputes, and analyzes the current litigation settlement mechanism and non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism of environmental civil disputes. Environmental pollution and destruction cause disputes of environmental interests among different stakeholders, and lead to a large number of environmental civil disputes. Therefore, the dispute resolution ability of the current environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism has been severely tested. In view of the defects of the dispute settlement method and the system design, the current dispute settlement mechanism can not achieve the purpose of dispute resolution. Secondly, it summarizes and evaluates the research results of the environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism in China, in order to provide a reference for the improvement of the diversified environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism. Diversification is a kind of consensus, under which the current research also revolves around the concrete system content of the diversified environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism and how to construct and perfect, the achievement and the insufficiency coexist. Finally, some suggestions are put forward. The trend of development indicates the direction of construction and perfection, and the development of things has its regularity. The concept of modern pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism does not promote the free pluralistic state, nor is it a simple recognition of this state of fact, but lies in the positive construction of rationality. The goal is to realize the coordination and interaction between litigation and non-litigation mechanism. The effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanism can be realized only by clarifying the scope of application of each solution, achieving the responsibility of each division and maintaining the coordination among the different ways.
【学位授予单位】:江西理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D925.1;D922.68
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 钟俊杰;;法社会学视角下的环境公益诉讼研究——以美国Storm King案为例[J];才智;2009年01期
2 蔡守秋,郭红欣;环境保护协定制度介评[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
3 张宁文;;构建环境公益诉讼制度的设想[J];巢湖学院学报;2008年04期
4 范愉;社会转型中的人民调解制度——以上海市长宁区人民调解组织改革的经验为视点[J];中国司法;2004年10期
5 齐树洁;司法改革与纠纷解决机制之重构[J];中国司法;2005年12期
6 石先广;;人民调解、行政调解、司法调解有机衔接的对策思考——以上海市杨浦区整合调解资源的实践探索为视点[J];中国司法;2006年08期
7 齐树洁;;和谐社会与多元化纠纷解决机制的构建[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2006年02期
8 张卫平;我国替代性纠纷解决机制的重构[J];法律适用;2005年02期
9 齐树洁;;论我国环境纠纷解决机制之重构[J];法律适用;2006年09期
10 吕忠梅;;环境公益诉讼辨析[J];法商研究;2008年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 徐昕;论私力救济[D];清华大学;2003年
2 张式军;环境公益诉讼原告资格研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 罗飞云;环境权诉讼法律制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2004年
2 周永;环境权与环境公益诉讼[D];福州大学;2005年
3 卢晓莉;环境纠纷行政调解制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
4 钱静;环境公益诉讼制度研究[D];重庆大学;2005年
5 李宇;环境污染民事纠纷的诉讼外解决机制研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
6 周晓莺;论环境民事公益诉讼制度[D];武汉大学;2005年
7 王建波;环境诉讼研究[D];郑州大学;2006年
8 魏玉金;环境纠纷ADR模式研究[D];福州大学;2006年
9 黄波;论我国环境纠纷的行政处理[D];河海大学;2006年
10 杨世超;我国当代民间调解研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
,本文编号:2423065
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2423065.html