论我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围
发布时间:2019-02-24 15:23
【摘要】:在海洋石油开发运输过程中,海洋油污事故会造成严重的海洋生态损害。当前,我国有关海洋油污损害赔偿的法律体系还不够完善,缺乏一部专门调整此类问题的法律。由于海洋油污生态损害的赔偿范围的法律规定的不明确,导致司法审判过程中索赔项目的不完整,损失得不到充分赔偿。本文在论证海洋油污生态损害赔偿的相关理论基础之上,剖析我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围的立法和司法中的不足,借鉴国际公约和国外海洋油污损害赔偿的相关规定,构建我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围,进而对我国海洋油污损害赔偿法律体系提出完善建议。 本文除了引言和结语外,正文部分共有四章: 第一章论述海洋油污生态损害赔偿的相关理论基础,对文中涉及的相关概念进行界定和比较,论证我国海洋油污生态损害的民事责任以及海洋油污所造成的损失范围。 第二章梳理我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿的立法现状和典型案例。阐述目前我国有关海洋油污生态损害评估的规定,总结我国目前在海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围的现存问题,为后文探讨海洋油污生态损害的赔偿范围及相关立法奠定基础。 第三章在比较法视角下考察海洋油污损害赔偿范围。本章首先就国际公约和国外立法中有关海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围进行梳理和分析,在此基础上,借鉴国际公约和他国立法的成功经验,对我国目前海洋油污生态损害赔偿法律体系进行反思。提出我国应统一油污立法,确立海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围,建立油污损害赔偿基金制度和完善海洋油污生态损害评估体系的建议。 第四章对我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围进行完善。首先,论证我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿范围确立的基本原则,提出以生态主义为中心的三大基本原则;其次,在基本原则的指导下,探讨分析我国海洋油污生态损害的赔偿范围;最后,为完善我国海洋油污生态损害赔偿的法律制度提出制定《石油污染法》和建立海洋油污生态损害赔偿地方体系的建议。
[Abstract]:In the process of offshore oil development and transportation, marine oil pollution accidents will cause serious marine ecological damage. At present, the legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution damage in China is not perfect, and there is a lack of a special law to adjust this kind of problem. Due to the unclear legal provisions of the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage, the claim items in the course of judicial trial are incomplete, and the losses are not fully compensated. On the basis of demonstrating the relevant theories of the compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, this paper analyzes the shortcomings in the legislation and judicature of the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage in China, and draws lessons from the international conventions and the relevant provisions of foreign marine oil pollution compensation. The scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in China is constructed, and suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution damage in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the relevant theoretical basis of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, and defines and compares the related concepts involved in this paper. The civil liability of marine oil pollution ecological damage and the scope of loss caused by marine oil pollution are demonstrated. The second chapter combs our country marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation legislation present situation and the typical case. This paper expounds the present regulations of marine oil pollution ecological damage assessment in China, summarizes the existing problems in the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage in our country, and lays a foundation for the following discussion on the compensation scope and related legislation of marine oil pollution ecological damage. The third chapter investigates the compensation scope of marine oil pollution damage from the perspective of comparative law. This chapter firstly combs and analyzes the scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in international conventions and foreign legislation, and on this basis, draws lessons from the successful experience of international conventions and other countries' legislation. The present legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage in China is reviewed. It is suggested that our country should unify the oil pollution legislation, establish the scope of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, establish the system of compensation fund for oil pollution damage and perfect the evaluation system of marine oil pollution ecological damage. The fourth chapter is to perfect the compensation range of marine oil pollution ecological damage in China. First of all, it demonstrates the basic principles of establishing the scope of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, and puts forward three basic principles centered on ecologicalism. Secondly, under the guidance of basic principles, the scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in China is discussed and analyzed. Finally, in order to perfect the legal system of marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation in China, the paper puts forward some suggestions on establishing the "Oil pollution Law" and establishing the local system of marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation.
【学位授予单位】:厦门大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.68;D923
本文编号:2429674
[Abstract]:In the process of offshore oil development and transportation, marine oil pollution accidents will cause serious marine ecological damage. At present, the legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution damage in China is not perfect, and there is a lack of a special law to adjust this kind of problem. Due to the unclear legal provisions of the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage, the claim items in the course of judicial trial are incomplete, and the losses are not fully compensated. On the basis of demonstrating the relevant theories of the compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, this paper analyzes the shortcomings in the legislation and judicature of the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage in China, and draws lessons from the international conventions and the relevant provisions of foreign marine oil pollution compensation. The scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in China is constructed, and suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution damage in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the relevant theoretical basis of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, and defines and compares the related concepts involved in this paper. The civil liability of marine oil pollution ecological damage and the scope of loss caused by marine oil pollution are demonstrated. The second chapter combs our country marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation legislation present situation and the typical case. This paper expounds the present regulations of marine oil pollution ecological damage assessment in China, summarizes the existing problems in the compensation scope of marine oil pollution ecological damage in our country, and lays a foundation for the following discussion on the compensation scope and related legislation of marine oil pollution ecological damage. The third chapter investigates the compensation scope of marine oil pollution damage from the perspective of comparative law. This chapter firstly combs and analyzes the scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in international conventions and foreign legislation, and on this basis, draws lessons from the successful experience of international conventions and other countries' legislation. The present legal system of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage in China is reviewed. It is suggested that our country should unify the oil pollution legislation, establish the scope of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, establish the system of compensation fund for oil pollution damage and perfect the evaluation system of marine oil pollution ecological damage. The fourth chapter is to perfect the compensation range of marine oil pollution ecological damage in China. First of all, it demonstrates the basic principles of establishing the scope of compensation for marine oil pollution ecological damage, and puts forward three basic principles centered on ecologicalism. Secondly, under the guidance of basic principles, the scope of compensation for ecological damage caused by marine oil pollution in China is discussed and analyzed. Finally, in order to perfect the legal system of marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation in China, the paper puts forward some suggestions on establishing the "Oil pollution Law" and establishing the local system of marine oil pollution ecological damage compensation.
【学位授予单位】:厦门大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.68;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王江凌;浅论海上船舶油污损害赔偿的范围和责任限额制度[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2003年02期
2 陈宜芳;论环境侵权之民事责任[J];法律适用;2003年Z1期
3 罗丽;环境侵权民事责任功能初探[J];法学评论;2004年03期
4 王树义;刘静;;美国自然资源损害赔偿制度探析[J];法学评论;2009年01期
5 竺效;;反思松花江水污染事故行政罚款的法律尴尬——以生态损害填补责任制为视角[J];法学;2007年03期
6 王淼,段志霞;海洋生态价值的特点及补偿[J];工业技术经济;2005年01期
7 牟丽环;杜永平;;海洋生态损害的侵权行为分析[J];重庆与世界(学术版);2013年05期
8 马中;陈红枫;;谈建立我国环境与自然资源损害评价制度[J];环境保护;2007年06期
9 钱水苗;;污染环境侵权行为民事责任的特点[J];杭州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年02期
10 程功舜;;海洋生态补偿的法律内涵及制度构建[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2011年04期
,本文编号:2429674
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2429674.html