南京政府婚姻法的女性主义法学分析

发布时间：2018-01-19 04:24

本文关键词： 南京政府婚姻法女性主义法学女性利益性别平等　出处：《河南大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 本文的主要目的是通过对南京政府婚姻法的具体制度、司法审判实务以及修改演变等方面的研究,客观评价其性别倾向和历史地位,探究在婚姻法近代化过程中女性利益保护方面的得失。除导论与结语外,全文共分六部分。主要内容简述如下: 导论部分主要阐述了本文的选题意义、研究现状、研究材料和研究思路,并重点介绍了提出妇女问题以及社会性别分析等女性主义法学研究方法。第一部分总结了中国婚姻法的历史演变过程,简要分析了传统婚姻制度、清末民初婚姻法草案以及南京政府婚姻法的特点。第二部分至第五部分是关于南京政府婚姻法中结婚、夫妻人身关系、夫妻财产关系、离婚等具体制度的女性主义法学分析。从法律文本的角度看,南京政府婚姻法在法律原则层面保护了女性在婚姻关系中的诸多利益,如婚约自由、结婚自由、离婚自由、贞操义务、独立人格等。但许多制度的设计仍不利于女性配偶,如女性配偶在夫妻共同财产中的利益、对子女的监护权、家庭暴力的界定、夫妻姓氏、住所指定权、暗护妾制等问题。许多女性利益没有体现在法典之中,如家务劳动在夫妻共同财产中的价值、婚内性权利义务、女性生育义务的补偿等方面。从司法实践效果看,深深植根于民间的婚姻习惯仍然强烈地影响着人们的婚姻行为,南京政府婚姻法在大量移植外国婚姻法律制度时,没有重视本国传统的婚姻习惯法,造成法律条文和社会现实之间出现了脱离。夫权思想对地方法院判决离婚案件有巨大影响。农村女性对南京政府婚姻法的认知远远低于城市女性,即使是城市女性在利用婚姻法保护自己利益时也要面对诸多不利因素。第六部分是对妻妾关系的分析。南京政府婚姻法不承认妾制度的合法性,而司法实务中却对妾加以保护,甚至出现了“妻不如妾”的法律现象。结语部分反思了南京政府婚姻法在维护女性利益、提高女性地位等方面的价值及其有限性,并认为南京政府婚姻法的性别倾向是偏重男性,歧视女性。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to objectively evaluate the gender orientation and historical status of the Nanjing Government through the study of the specific system, judicial practice and revision and evolution of the Nanjing Government's Marriage Law. To explore the gains and losses of the protection of women's interests in the process of marriage law modernization. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into six parts. The introduction mainly expounds the significance of the topic, the present research situation, the research materials and the research ideas, and focuses on the research methods of feminist law, such as women's issues and gender analysis. The first part summarizes the historical evolution of China's marriage law, and briefly analyzes the characteristics of the traditional marriage system, the draft marriage law of the late Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China and the Nanjing Government's Marriage Law. The second part to 5th part is about the Nanjing government marriage law marriage, husband and wife personal relationship, husband and wife property relations, divorce and other specific systems of feminist legal analysis. From the perspective of the legal text. Nanjing Government's Marriage Law protects many interests of women in marriage relations, such as freedom of marriage, freedom of marriage, freedom of divorce, obligation of chastity. Independent personality, etc... But many systems are still not conducive to the design of female spouses, such as the interests of female spouses in the common property of the couple, custody of children, definition of domestic violence, husband and wife family name, right to specify domicile. Many women's interests are not reflected in the code, such as the value of domestic work in the joint property of husband and wife, marital sexual rights and obligations. From the effect of judicial practice, the marriage habits deeply rooted in the folk still strongly affect people's marriage behavior. Nanjing government marriage law in a large number of foreign marriage law system, did not attach importance to the traditional marriage customary law. Resulting in a divorce between the legal provisions and social reality. The concept of "husband power" has a great impact on the local courts to adjudicate divorce cases. Rural women's understanding of Nanjing government marriage law is far lower than that of urban women. Even urban women face many unfavorable factors when using marriage law to protect their own interests. The 6th part is an analysis of the relationship between wives and concubines. Nanjing Government's Marriage Law does not recognize the legality of concubinage system, while in judicial practice, concubinage is protected, and even the legal phenomenon of "wife is inferior to concubine" appears. The conclusion part reflects on the value and limitation of Nanjing Government Marriage Law in safeguarding the interests of women and improving the status of women, and points out that the gender tendency of Nanjing Government Marriage Law is biased towards men and discriminates against women.
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D923.9;D929

【引证文献】