民商合一前见与私法理论悬疑

发布时间：2018-03-23 02:30

本文选题：民商合一　切入点：私法　出处：《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：民商合一前见影响了私法理论研究,导致主体法中行为能力理论出现误置,导致为自然人主体量身打造的行为能力制度泛化到法人,并生搬硬套到商主体,捏造出商事行为能力;婚姻家庭法司法解释受到商法理念误导,以商业财产性质异化婚姻家庭财产,交易规则扭曲了家庭伦理规则;财产法范畴体系矛盾,物权与财产权范畴位序不当,所有与占有制度功能定位不准;财产运行机制中无因性理论出现误置,格式合同规制片面。民商合一前见模糊民事关系与商事关系,没有做到让民法制度规则遵循民法逻辑,让商法制度规则遵循商法逻辑,对于许多基本问题的理论解释缺乏说服力,制度设计缺乏针对性与有效性。
[Abstract]:Prior to the integration of civil and commercial law, the theoretical study of private law was affected, which led to the misplacement of the theory of capacity for conduct in the subject law, resulting in the generalization of the system of capacity of conduct created for the natural person to legal person, and the application of the system to the subject of business. The judicial interpretation of marriage and family law is misled by the commercial law idea, and the property of marriage and family is alienated by the nature of commercial property, the transaction rules distort the family ethics rules, the system of property law is contradictory, The category of real right and property right is not in order, the functional orientation of all and possession system is not correct, the theory of non-causality in property operation mechanism is misplaced, the form of contract regulation is one-sided, and the civil and commercial relations are blurred before the integration of civil and commercial affairs. Failing to make the rules of civil law follow the logic of civil law and the rules of commercial law follow the logic of commercial law, the theoretical explanation of many basic problems is unconvincing, and the system design lacks pertinence and validity.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学规划课题(09xja820006) 国家社会科学基金课题(11BFX027)
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】